Friday, April 27, 2012

Voris outs scandal of sanctioned "gay masses"

It is a sign of our times, wrote Tom Bethell recently, that Patrick J. Buchanan was blamed for launching a culture war by noticing that we were under attack. Similarly, Michael Voris has been and will be blamed for launching an insensitive war on gays by noticing that Catholic faith and morals are under attack from a culture of rampant indulgence towards gay activists. The more's the irony, because the stance Voris takes toward gays is actually as profoundly compassionate as it is faithful to Catholic faith and morals. But what will provoke hatred of Voris more than anything else on this score is his simple statement of the obvious, his naming of places, churches, bishops, events -- in short, the simple statement of facts. "How could he be so rude as to state facts?!"


4 comments:








Christine

said...

Michael is a brave man. I love that he is standing RIGHT outside the very church he is critiquing, in the heart of a gay-friendly district. I was half-expecting some gay activist to walk by in the middle of the video and throw something at him...





Anonymous

said...

I know that this is a naïve question but it is also a sincere one. Since the Pope has the authority to clean house, why does he not? Anyone care to guess?

Donna





Christine

said...

Colleen Hammond interviewed Michael Voris just a few days ago:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/up-close/2012/05/01/up-close-with-michael-voris





Steve "scotju" Dalton

said...

Voris is always catching hell from the weak sisters because he's so "rude". Oh, boo-hoo! I wish there was a hundred Voris's in this country who would be as rude as he is! The only people who gripe about MV being rude are the cafeteria clergy and laity and certain apologetics guru's who are jealous that Mike Voris has left them in the dust with his fast growing internet apostolate, and great personal charm that they don't seem to have. Yep, the average guy in the pew, and good sound, orthodox priests don't seem to have a problem with Mike, it only the 'lost in the 60's' crowd that resents him.