This has been around for a long time, but well worth revisiting if you haven't seen it for a while. And if you HAVEN'T seen it, well ... it's an absolute MUST! You gotta LOVE this guy!
[Hat tip to P.M. via Fr. Z.]

"What is the first business of philosophy? To part with self-conceit. ...It is impossible for anyone to begin to learn what he thinks he already knows." -- Epictetus (c. 100 A.D.)
Newman's essential classic (above) distinguishing organic doctrinal developments, like the Trinity, from flagrant doctrinal innovations, like sola scriptura
The best resource on Islam in print! (above)
Want to see through the political fog surrounding Muslim terrorism? Read this book!
Pope Benedict XVI's definitive statement on truth and tolerance
Best all-around intro to Christianity (by Pope Benedict XVI)
Pope Benedict's classic on fundamental principles of theology
Pope Benedict XVI on the liturgy
(This anthology contains Pope Benedict's sympathetic position statement on the Tridentine Mass)
(The above volume offers Pope Benedict's reflections on the meaning of the Eucharist)
(Above: best popular-level intro to common sense "natural law" basis of morality you'll ever find)
Ronald Knox's classic work (above)
Howard's eloquent meditation as a new convert (above)
Bouyer's classic (above) on how the positive elements of Protestantism can be sustained only if rooted in the Catholic Church (by a former Lutheran pastor in France)
Cobbett's incensed expose (above) of the actual origins of his Anglican tradition--"Engendered in
beastly lust, brought forth in hypocrisy and perfidy, and cherished and fed by plunder, devastation, and by rivers of
English and Irish blood."
A Hilaire Belloc classic (above)
Belloc's profoundly insightful analysis (above) of personal character in individuals ranging from Henry VIII to Oliver Cromwell
Waugh's moving biographies (above) of Ronald Knox and the Jesuit martyr Edmund Campion
Duffy's definitive refutation (above) of the Protestant textbook tradition of the English Reformation as a "grassroots" movement
A brilliant expose (above) of why Catholic hymnody since Vatican II represents the triumph of bad taste over a rich tradition of beauty and dignity
4 comments:
Mike Walsh
said...
As for ‘liturgical dance’ –I can accept it in theory, at least in cultures where dance plays a large traditional role—but I’ve never seen an example in person that wasn’t completely silly and distracting. You can scarcely get white folks to sing at mass; what makes anyone think they should get up and dance?
romishgraffiti
said...
As for ‘liturgical dance’ –I can accept it in theory, at least in cultures where dance plays a large traditional role
Yep. Africa (specifically Ethiopia I believe) is often invoked as a justification of liturgical dance. I've only seen one video of African liturgical dance, and it was during the procession and looked nothing like the nonsense we see in the West. My understanding is that after the procession all the dancing stops, but I could be wrong. Second, why don't all these pro-lit dancing types switch rites if they want it so bad? It is allowed after all.
Rachel Gray
said...
C.S. Lewis argued that he wanted fewer hymns sung in his Anglican church because the congregation was flat-out bad at singing and we should offer to God's glory what we do *well*, not what we do badly. That's a pretty good argument against liturgical dance as well. (But not the only argument!)
Pertinacious Papist
said...
Great comment, Rachel. Lewis somewhere also compares liturgy to a dance, but only to say that therefore its form should not keep changing. Only then, can one master the steps of the dance, forget about what his feet are doing, and concentrate on his PARTNER! Excellent point!
As for the 'inculturation' argument for places like Africa, I would suggest that this should never be taken as a pretext or excuse for neglecting to INCULCATE in native converts the liturgical patrimony of Catholic tradition.
Post a Comment