data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71816/7181605acedb6529654c541fcccaec0524ffdfb7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46c4c/46c4ca061e329683f802a5b9f8322cf9d3b53500" alt=""
Instead of Fessio, Nicholas J. Healy Jr., President of AMU, responded to Messaros' article by writing a response in NOR. Messaros was then given the chance, per standard form, of replying to the response. Fessio was again contacted by NOR and asked if anyone wanted to reply to the second Messaros article. This time, he did so (in the Jan. 2005) issue, attacking Messaros in very personal terms. Again, Messaros was given the right to respond, and he did so in kind. Fessio insisted that he and AMU should have the last word. NOR editor Vree replied that according to convention, in publications the original author has the right to have the last word. When Vree spoke with Fessio on August 27th, the latter insisting that he could defeat all the arguments of his opponents single-handedly, leading Vree to assume Fessio would write a letter defending himself from the third Messaros article.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50ad5/50ad5f3c316b3fdb2027b0bb945b00e8f05b3614" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f250a/f250a5efa0c4eeebd01f49f749454d55a4bfaa07" alt=""
The AMC/AMU controversy has nothing to do, of course, with Ignatius Press. Both AMC and AMU were conceived and brought into existence by faithful Catholics concerned with the future and integrity of Catholic education for the younger generations. Ignatius Press was conceived and brought into existence by a faithful Jesuit priest concerned with the future and integrity of Catholic publishing in the years to come. It is a sad commentary on otherwise good and decent Catholics in the modern world that they cannot resolve their problems without going ballistic with one another. (See New Oxford Notes: "Fr. Fessio Goes Ballistic.")
No comments:
Post a Comment