Sunday, November 15, 2015

Secularism's guilty compassion and resentful brutality


The great nineteenth-century Spanish Catholic political thinker, Juan Donosco Cortes, addressing the issue of capital punishment in his Catholicism, Liberalism and Socialism, writes:
Governments seem to be endowed with an unerring instinct that teaches them that they can only be just or strong in the name of God. Thus it happens that whenever they commence to secularize, that is to say, to separate themselves from God, they always begin to relax the severity of penalties, as if conscious that their right was weakened. The loose modern theories regarding criminal law are contemporaneous with the decadence of religion, and they have prevailed in the code whenever the complete secularization of political power was established....

"Those who have made the world believe that this earth can be converted into a paradise, have not more readily made it believe it ought to be a paradise where blood is never shed. The end is not in the illusion, but in the very day and hour that this fallacy is everywhere accepted: blood will then gush from the rocks, and the earth will become a hell. Man cannot aspire to an impossible felicity in this obscure valley of our dark pilgrimage without losing the little happiness he already possesses."

Fr. Perrone: Bishop Athanasius Schneider and the Synod

Fr. Eduard Perrone, "A Pastor's Descant" [temporary link] (Assumption Grotto News, November 15, 2015):
This weekend we celebrate the Forty Hours Devotion, and you would expect me to write on that topic. The homilies for the day, however, I deem sufficient matter for your reflection on the most Holy Eucharist, though there can never be enough said about this magnum mysterium since it concerns the prolongation of the very incarnation of the Son of God, yet in a manner more abstruse than the incarnation itself since, for just one point, in the Holy Sacrament the Lord is bodily present in many places all at once, something beyond what He did when He walked in Palestine.

My principal subject today is a brief digest of a commentary made by the stalwart Bishop Athanasius Schneider on the recent Synod of Bishops. The whole piece is well worth the read, but I bring out a few highlights for those who may be otherwise unable to peruse the entire document. I quote him here freely, stringing various phrases together, without respect to the rigorous discipline now universally imposed on writers in quoting their sources. In your charity, I beg your indulgence for this unpardonable indiscretion!
“In our days there exists a permanent and omnipresent pressure on behalf of the mass media, which are compliant with...anti-Christian powers, to abolish the truth of the indissolubility of marriage, trivializing the sacred character of this Divine institution by spreading an anti-culture of divorce and concubinage. ...When Catholics by means of divorce and adultery...repudiate the will of God expressed in the Sixth Commandment, they put themselves in a spiritually serious danger of losing their eternal salvation. ...Those who conduct a married life with a partner who is not his legitimate spouse, as is the case with divorced and civilly remarried, reject the will of God. ...The Final Report of the Synod unfortunately omits to convince the divorced and remarried concerning their concrete sin. On the contrary, under the pretext of mercy and a false pastorality, those (progressive) Synod Fathers...tried to cover up the spiritually dangerous state of the divorced and (civilly) remarried. (Moreover the Final Report) justifies indirectly such a lifestyle by means of assigning this question ultimately to the area of the individual consciences... and gives the impression...that a public life in adultery–as is the case of civilly remarried–is not violating the indissoluble sacramental bond...or that it does not represent a mortal or grave sin and that this issue is furthermore a matter of private conscience. ...(However) the shepherds (bishops) of the Church should not in the slightest manner promote a culture of divorce amongst the faithful. ...The Final Report seems to inaugurate a doctrinal and disciplinary cacophony in the Catholic Church, which contradicts the very essence of being Catholic. ...(It) caused a situation of obscuration, confusion, subjectivity...and an un-Catholic doctrinal and disciplinary particularism in a matter which is essentially connected to the deposit of faith transmitted by the Apostles. ...It is therefore a real shame that Catholic bishops, the successors of the Apostles, used synodal assemblies in order to make an attempt on the constant and unchangeable practice of the Church regarding the indissolubility of marriage, that is, in the non-admittance of the divorced who live in an adulterous union to the Sacraments. ...Through the solemn promise in the episcopal ordination...every candidate..promised: ‘I will keep pure and integral the deposit of faith according to the tradition which was always and everywhere preserved in the Church.’ The ambiguity found in..the Report contradicts the abovementioned solemn episcopal vow. Everyone in the Church, from the simple faithful to the holders of the magisterium, should say: ‘I will not accept an obfuscated speech nor a skillful masked backdoor to a profanation of the Sacraments of Marriage and Eucharist. Likewise, I will not accept a mockery of the Sixth Commandment of God. I prefer to be ridiculed and persecuted rather than to accept ambiguous texts and insincere methods.’ Now there’s a voice to be heeded! My reaction to Bishop Schneider’s straightforward teaching echoes what was once said concerning the teaching of Christ: “He teaches with authority, and not like the scribes” (Mt. 7:29).
Fr. Perrone

P.S. Next Sunday would be the feast of Saint Cecilia, patroness of music. The day, being a Sunday, the Lord’s day, must be celebrated in the breach by lovers of sacred music.

Tridentine Masses coming this week to metro Detroit and east Michigan


Tridentine Masses This Coming Week

Tridentine Community News - Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI on Purgatory; TLM Mass times


"I will go in unto the Altar of God
To God, Who giveth joy to my youth"

Tridentine Community News by Alex Begin (November 15, 2015):
November 15, 2015 – Sixth Resumed Sunday After Epiphany

Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI on Purgatory

Fr. Dennis Brown, OMV, Spiritual Director for the Permanent Diaconate program at Denver’s St. John Vianney Theological Seminary, recently posted the following excerpt from Pope Benedict XVI’s encyclical on hope, Spe Salvi. He intriguingly called it “Perhaps the most beautiful thing ever written on purgatory. It makes purgatory something to look forward to.”
45. This early Jewish idea of an intermediate state includes the view that these souls are not simply in a sort of temporary custody but, as the parable of the rich man illustrates, are already being punished or are experiencing a provisional form of bliss. There is also the idea that this state can involve purification and healing which mature the soul for communion with God. The early Church took up these concepts, and in the Western Church they gradually developed into the doctrine of Purgatory. We do not need to examine here the complex historical paths of this development; it is enough to ask what it actually means. With death, our life-choice becomes definitive—our life stands before the judge. Our choice, which in the course of an entire life takes on a certain shape, can have a variety of forms. There can be people who have totally destroyed their desire for truth and readiness to love, people for whom everything has become a lie, people who have lived for hatred and have suppressed all love within themselves. This is a terrifying thought, but alarming profiles of this type can be seen in certain figures of our own history. In such people all would be beyond remedy and the destruction of good would be irrevocable: this is what we mean by the word Hell[37]. On the other hand there can be people who are utterly pure, completely permeated by God, and thus fully open to their neighbours—people for whom communion with God even now gives direction to their entire being and whose journey towards God only brings to fulfilment what they already are[38].

46. Yet we know from experience that neither case is normal in human life. For the great majority of people—we may suppose—there remains in the depths of their being an ultimate interior openness to truth, to love, to God. In the concrete choices of life, however, it is covered over by ever new compromises with evil—much filth covers purity, but the thirst for purity remains and it still constantly re-emerges from all that is base and remains present in the soul. What happens to such individuals when they appear before the Judge? Will all the impurity they have amassed through life suddenly cease to matter? What else might occur? Saint Paul, in his First Letter to the Corinthians, gives us an idea of the differing impact of God’s judgement according to each person’s particular circumstances. He does this using images which in some way try to express the invisible, without it being possible for us to conceptualize these images—simply because we can neither see into the world beyond death nor do we have any experience of it. Paul begins by saying that Christian life is built upon a common foundation: Jesus Christ. This foundation endures. If we have stood firm on this foundation and built our life upon it, we know that it cannot be taken away from us even in death. Then Paul continues: “Now if any one builds on the foundation with gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, straw—each man’s work will become manifest; for the Day will disclose it, because it will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives, he will receive a reward. If any man’s work is burned up, he will suffer loss, though he himself will be saved, but only as through fire” (1 Cor 3:12-15). In this text, it is in any case evident that our salvation can take different forms, that some of what is built may be burned down, that in order to be saved we personally have to pass through “fire” so as to become fully open to receiving God and able to take our place at the table of the eternal marriage-feast.

47. Some recent theologians are of the opinion that the fire which both burns and saves is Christ himself, the Judge and Saviour. The encounter with him is the decisive act of judgement. Before his gaze all falsehood melts away. This encounter with him, as it burns us, transforms and frees us, allowing us to become truly ourselves. All that we build during our lives can prove to be mere straw, pure bluster, and it collapses. Yet in the pain of this encounter, when the impurity and sickness of our lives become evident to us, there lies salvation. His gaze, the touch of his heart heals us through an undeniably painful transformation “as through fire”. But it is a blessed pain, in which the holy power of his love sears through us like a flame, enabling us to become totally ourselves and thus totally of God. In this way the inter-relation between justice and grace also becomes clear: the way we live our lives is not immaterial, but our defilement does not stain us for ever if we have at least continued to reach out towards Christ, towards truth and towards love. Indeed, it has already been burned away through Christ’s Passion. At the moment of judgement we experience and we absorb the overwhelming power of his love over all the evil in the world and in ourselves. The pain of love becomes our salvation and our joy. It is clear that we cannot calculate the “duration” of this transforming burning in terms of the chronological measurements of this world. The transforming “moment” of this encounter eludes earthly time-reckoning—it is the heart’s time, it is the time of “passage” to communion with God in the Body of Christ[39]. The judgement of God is hope, both because it is justice and because it is grace. If it were merely grace, making all earthly things cease to matter, God would still owe us an answer to the question about justice—the crucial question that we ask of history and of God. If it were merely justice, in the end it could bring only fear to us all. The incarnation of God in Christ has so closely linked the two together—judgement and grace—that justice is firmly established: we all work out our salvation “with fear and trembling” (Phil 2:12). Nevertheless grace allows us all to hope, and to go trustfully to meet the Judge whom we know as our “advocate”, or parakletos (cf. 1 Jn 2:1).
Tridentine Masses This Coming Week
  • Mon. 11/16 7:00 PM: Low Mass at St. Josaphat (St. Gertrude the Great, Virgin)
  • Tue. 11/17 7:00 PM: Low Mass at Holy Name of Mary (St. Gregory the Wonderworker, Bishop & Confessor)
[Comments? Please e-mail tridnews@detroitlatinmass.org. Previous columns are available at http://www.detroitlatinmass.org. This edition of Tridentine Community News, with minor editions, is from the St. Albertus (Detroit), Academy of the Sacred Heart (Bloomfield Hills), and St. Alphonsus and Holy Name of Mary Churches (Windsor) bulletin inserts for November 15, 2015. Hat tip to Alex Begin, author of the column.]

"Microaggressions"


"From Leviathan University's Student Modification Guidebook, 2015-16" (Intercollegiate Review, Fall, 2015):
Leviathan University prides itself on leading the fight against social maladjustment and transgressive vocables. Toward this end, we have added this new chapter on microaggressions.

Please read this carefully, as the penalties for violating the new behavioral guidelines include social-media shaming, shunning, serious threat of expulsion, quasi-expulsion, expulsion, post-expulsion I-Told-You-So, and self-financed apology tour.

Definition

A "microaggression" is unintended and unconscious discriminatory behavior resulting in emotionally, psychologically, or politically discernible marginalization. It entails the application of "known social norms" to unsuspecting victims, who suffer discriminatory-like repercussions such as bed head (due to sleep disruption), moodiness, whiny affect, and killing sprees.

Microaggressions typically manifest themselves in three ways:
  • microassault: an explicit verbal/nonverbal derogation -- e.g., denying that someone is a person of color solely on the basis of color, thereby implying that race is not a social construct; speaking as if you were mentally placing "microaggression" in quotation marks, etc.
  • microinsult: coded messages, subtle snubs that demean a person's identity, whether that identity is obvious or not -- e.g., telling someone to be "reasonable," a white, Western category associated with a history of slavery and overcharging for fresh produce.
  • microinvalidation: expressions of negativity that make persons feel they are not worthy to feel their feelings; insisting that something didn't happen just because it didn't, etc.
Professor Hroswitha Gandersheim of Leviathan's Department of Noetic Poetics has define three further sublevels of microaggressive activity:
  • mini-microaggression: an aggressive communication that only dogs can perceive; dreaming that someone you know is dreaming of you in a nonconsensual manner, etc.
  • subatomic microaggressions: shifts in elementary particles that affect energy flow, resulting in unwanted changes to one's position relative to the cafeteria.
  • macro-microaggressions: repeating oneself to a nondeaf person; saying "Ya know" when clearly the intended victim does not; insisting that someone is innocent until proven guilty, thereby privileging a white, Western standard of jurisprudence, etc.
How to Respond When You Are the Victim of Microaggression
  1. Panic: The long-term effects of such assaults are undetectable, and thus are the more subversive in theirimpacts.
  2. Take to social media: Tweeting out the nature of the offense and the name of the offender will create a "wall of susceoptibullying"
  3. File a formal complaint with the Office of Hostile Gestures: It won't take more than two or three hours, and there is cake and nontactile massage.
  4. Seek counseling: Leviathan offers a wide variety of treatment and exhortation options, including an app for your phone that can be programmed to confirm your self-image every fifteen minutes.
We at Leviathan University remain hopeful that one day no one will ever interact with another person in such a way that a "communication" can be proved to have taken place. Until such day, there's always university bureaucracy.

Saturday, November 14, 2015

Pope Francis "systematically" revolutionizing college of bishops and cardinals

Sandro Magister, "The Real Francis Revolution Marches to the Beat of Appointments" (www.chiesa, November 14, 2015): "In the United States and in Italy the changes are most spectacular. With new “Bergoglio-style" bishops and cardinals. In Belgium, Danneels’s revenge against Ratzinger. The triumph of the St. Gallen club."
ROME, November 14, 2015 – Much more than reforming the Vatican curia and finances (to which he is applying himself more out of obligation than out of passion, with no comprehensive plan and too often relying on the wrong men and women), it is clear by now that Pope Francis wants to revolutionize the college of bishops. And he is doing so in a systematic way.

"Modern Educayshun"


[Hat tip to L.S.]

Wherein Fr. Z. takes Card. Danneels to the woodshed

Fr. John  Zuhlsdorf, "Wherein Card. Danneels makes excuses" (Fr. Z's Blog, November 13, 2015):
Retired Belgian Godfried Cardinal Danneels – who protected a child abuser priest – was invited to the last Synod on the Family despite the fact that he was over 80. HERE That was a surprise, both because of the scandal Danneels was involved in and because of his age. Because of his age because the Cardinal Bishop of Hong Kong (who is standing up to homosexualists), younger than Danneels, was told that he was too old to participate.  Double standard?  You decide.
Danneels was also apparently involved in a group that – contrary to the rules that John Paul II established for conclaves and which Danneels and the others swore oaths to obey – conspired with a group to influence the election.  HERENow Danneels is in the spotlight again, for these comments. From Catholic World News:
Worth reading: Read more >>

Friday, November 13, 2015

What's wrong with free public colleges and $15/hr minimum wages? Nothing, if you can find a way to pay for them.

Neil Cavuto questions student who wants free college and has no idea how to pay for it



Such uncommon common nonsense!

Here's a bit of pushback from Bill Whittle against the myth about paying our way by soaking the rich, no matter how feasible that may seem after listening to our Activist-in-Chief, or, for that matter, some idiot like Michael Moore. Since it's from March of 2011, and I know that's gotta be "ancient history" to most "plugged-in" kids these days, let's call it a "lesson from history":

"Eat the Rich!"

One hardly needs to support the Republican establishment to see the folly Bill Whittle exposes here.

The one point on which I agree with the young lady interviewed by Neil Cavuto is that the "Corporate model" of education has become a problem. College presidents used to come from the ranks of the faculty and teach one or two courses in addition to their administrative responsibilities. Today they are drawn from a pool of elite executives and draw salaries rivalling those in the corporate world. That's only the tip of the iceberg.

The other part I'm concerned apart is that what most students are getting in exchange for the astronomical tuitions their parents are forking over is more often than not either the equivalent of a technical trade school education (computer science, mechanical engineering, business management, nursing, etc.), which they could get far more economically at a local community college, or something that passes for a "liberal arts" education but is really anything but that (queer studies, feminist studies, post-colonial Latin American studies, gender studies, literature of phallocentrism, etc.), usually taught by the most illiberal ideologues on campus.

What can be done? (1) If people want to keep the expectation that all their kids will "go to college," colleges may have to give up their "corporate model." Otherwise they will no longer be able to afford college for their kids.

(2) The alternative, which I personally believe makes the most sense, is to abandon the myth that everyone should get a "liberal arts education." First of all, most colleges and universities are not really "liberal arts" institutions anymore anyway. Second, the vast majority of students attending them aren't cut out to study the "liberal arts" as classically understood, even if the institutions retained a required core of traditional "liberal arts" studies. This would require going back to the old, traditional English and European models of education, where the vast majority of students out of high school would go to trade schools or finishing schools, and only a handful of those interested and able would go on for a traditional liberal arts educations at universities, for which they'd have to compete for limited scholarships.

So-called "college education" these days has pretty much collapsed into a fantasy. There are rare and valiant exceptions; but it seems to me that the writing has been on the wall for some time.

Funny thing: I doubt most "college grads" today could pass eighth grade-level exams like this from 1895.

[Hat tip to C.B.]

Time to pull the plug on general "higher education" (I use the words loosely)

To quote my son, C.B., "these students belong in nursery school, not college":C.B. comments: "Perhaps the most astonishing thing about these students’ censorious actions is how profoundly conservative they are. By communicating an expectation that their master or president protect them from unsightly Halloween costumes, or promise them no more hurtful words will be said at their expense, students are essentially calling for a return to campus life under in loco parentis. They reject not merely a free and open campus dialogue, but adulthood itself."

René Girard (1923-2015) - RIP

René Noël Théophile Girard (December 25, 1923 – November 4, 2015) was a French Catholic historian, literary critic, and philosopher of social science whose work belongs to the tradition of anthropological philosophy. He authored nearly thirty books, with his writings spanning many academic domains. Among his most basic ideas, which he developed throughout his career and provided the foundation for his thinking, was his view that desire is mimetic (i.e., imitative - all of our desires are 'borrowed' from other people), that all conflict originates in mimetic rivalry, that the scapegoat mechanism is the origin of sacrifice and the foundation of human culture, and one role of religion has been to control the violence that can come from mimetic rivalry, and that the Bible reveals these ideas and denounces the scapegoat mechanism.

Born in Avignon on December 25, 1923, he studied medieval history at the École des Chartes, Paris (1943-1947). In 1947 he went to Indiana University on a one-year fellowship and remained in the United States for the rest of his career. He earned his doctorate at the same institution in 1950, and accepted teaching positions at Duke University and Bryn Mawr College from 1953-1957, after which he taught at Johns Hopkins University, where he became full professor in 1961, and State University of New York at Buffalo. In 1981 he became Andrew B. Hammond Professor of French Language, Literature, and Civilization at Stanford University, where he remained the rest of his career. He was Honorary Chair of the Colloquium on Violence and Religion, whose cofounder and first president was the Roman Catholic theologian, Raymund Schwager. He was awarded his first honorary degree by the Free University of Amsterdam in 1985, and elected to the Académie française in 2005. He died on November 4, 2015 at his residence in Stanford, California, following a long illness.

Bishop Robert Barron, in "René Girard, Church Father" (Word on Fire, November 10, 2015), offers a concise assessment of the significance René Girard, which is worth reading and illuminating (apart from the fact that he unaccountably refers Girard as "Church Father").

See also Artur Rosman, "Lux Aeterna: RIP René Girard (December 25, 1923 – Nov 4, 2015)" (Patheos, November 4, 2015).

[Hat tip to Artur Rosman]

Wednesday, November 11, 2015

Fascinating: Yale historian Timothy Snyder on why the Holocaust happened

Men win the right to go into women's bathrooms: now there's an achievement ...


Miles Swigart, "Dallas Allows Men Into Women’s Bathrooms" (CM, November 11, 2015).

Of course these aren't men who would call themselves "men," and whom Arnold Schwarzenegger would have once called "girly men." But these days people seem to have the "right" to "construct" their own reality, so I guess the sky's the limit. Maybe I'll decide to become the reincarnation of Mighty Mouse.

Small difference. The point is: don't we have anything better to do with our time these days? Most of the issue that occupy the news seem to be legal battles over the most inane things, which is putting the matter charitably.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Not Coming to a World Youth Day Near You

Roman Amerio's Iota Unum is a big doorstop of a book, one that covers a sprawling territory. But surprisingly, the brief section that I think best captures and communicates the difference between today's Catholic 'theology' and the perennial wisdom of the Church is the item on "The Church and Youth." Or maybe this is not surprising, since usually what we communicate to young people is a good indicator of what we truly value and find important. I think this is the case here. Can you imagine any speaker sharing any such words at one of today's World Youth Days? "My topic for today is Lighten Up or Grow Up?" Ha-ha. I think not. Maybe there is some possible sort of fusion, a la inverting Dorothy Day or John Piper's idea of 'The Duty of Delight" into "The Delight of Duty"? But either way, as for Amerio, good stuff for kids and a strong reminder for adults. With a nice dose of impressive-sounding Latin. -- Guy Noir - Private Eye.
The Church and Youth

There are other aspects of human life that the Church views differently since the council. The deminutio capiris  based on age, which was imposed by Paul VI in his decree Ingravescentem aetatem, was an indirect sign of the new attitude it has adopted towards youth. The new view is directly expressed in other documents.

From ancient times down to our own, youth has been regarded by philosophy, ethics, art and common sense as a time of natural and moral imperfection, that is, incompleteness. St. Augustine goes so far as to call the desire to return to childhood stupidity and folly and writes in this sermon Ad iuvenes flos aetatis, periculum tentationis, insisting on youth’s moral immaturity.  Because his reason is not yet settled and is liable to go awry a young man is cereus in cereus in vitium flecti, and in his youth needs a ruler, adviser and teacher. He needs a light to see that life has a moral goal, and practical help to mold and transform his natural inclinations in accordance with the rational order of things. All the great Catholic educators from Benedict of Nursia to Ignatius of Loyola, Joseph Calasanz, John Baptist de la Salle, and John Bosco made this idea the basis of Catholic education. The young person is a subject possessing freedom and must be trained to use his freedom in such a way that he himself chooses that one thing for the choosing of which our freedom has been given us; namely; to choose to do our duty, since religion sees no other end to life than this. The delicacy of the educator's task comes from the fact that its object is a being who is a subject, and that its goal is the perfecting of that subject. It is acting upon human freedom not in order to limit it but to make it really free. In this respect the act of educating is an imitation of divine causality which, according to Thomistic theory produces a man’s free actions even in their very freedom. The Church's attitude to youth cannot ignore the difference between the imperfect and the relatively more perfect, the ignorant and the relatively more informed. It cannot set aside the differences between things and treat young people as mature, learners as experts, lessers as greaters and (here the fundamental error returns) in the final analysis, the dependent as independent.

Character of Youth and a Critique of Life as Joy [Say what?!]

The profound Thomistic theory of potency and act assists a student of human nature in considering the nature of youth, by supporting him in seeking out the essential characteristics of that stage of life, and by stopping him being led astray by prevailing opinion.

Given that youth is the beginning of life, it is important that a view of the whole of life ahead be presented to it and that it keep that view in mind; a view of the goal in which the beginner’s potential will be realized, the form in which his powers will unfold. Life is difficult, or, if you prefer, serious. Firstly; this is because man’s nature is weak and in its finitude it collides with the finitude of other men and of the things around, all these finitudes tending to trespass on each other. Secondly it is part of the Catholic faith that man is fallen and inclined to evil. Man’s disorderly propensities mean that he is beset by opposing attractions and that his condition is one of struggle, of war, even of siege. That there is a potency within life which must be  brought out means that life is not only difficult but interesting, since interest consists in having something lying within (interest). This does not mean, however, that man should realize himself in the current phrase, but rather that he should be transformed by realizing the values for which he is created and which call him to that transformation. It is curious that when post-conciliar theology so often uses the word metanoia, which means a transformation of the mind [or repentance], it should go on to put so much emphasis on the realization of the self. It is pleasant to go with one's inclination, and rough to resist one’s own ego in order to mold it. The difficulty of it is recognized in philosophy, poetic adages, politics and myths. Every good is acquired or achieved at the price of effort. The Greek sage says the gods have put sweat between us and excellence, and Horace says: multa tulit fecitque puer, sudait et alsit. lt was a commonplace of education in ancient times that human life is a combat and an effort, and the letter upsilon became a symbol of the fact, but not the upsilon with equally sloping arms, Y, but the Pythagorean one with one arm upright and the other bent, P. Antiquity also applied to life the much told tale of Hercules at the fork in the road.

Life is today unrealistically presented to young people as joy, taking joy to mean the partial sort that comforts the soul in via rather than the full joy which satisfies it only in termino. The hardness of human life, which used so often to be referred to in prayers as a vale of tears, is denied or disguised. Since the result of this change in emphasis is to depict happiness as a man's natural state and thus as something due to him, the new ideal is to prepare a path for the young man which is secura d'ogn'intoppo e d'ogni sbarro. Thus every obstacle they have to overcome is seen by young people as an injustice, and barriers are looked upon not as tests, but as a scandal. Adults have abandoned the exercise of their authority through a desire to please, since they cannot believe they will be loved unless they flatter and please their children. The prophet’s warning applies to them: Vae quae consuut pulvillos sub omni cubito manus et faciunt cervicalia sub capite universae aetatis.

All the themes of the juvenilism of the contemporary world, in which the Church shares, come together in Pope Paul’s speech to a group of hippies who had come to Rome for a peace demonstration in April 1971. The Pope sketches and enumerates with praise those “secret values” young people are searching for.

The first is spontaneity, which doesn’t strike the Pope as being at odds with searching, even though a sought spontaneity ceases to be spontaneous. Nor does spontaneity seem to him at odds with morality even though the latter involves considered intentions, superimposes itself upon spontaneity and can clash with it. The second value is “liberation from certain formal and conventional ties.” The Pope does not specify what they are. As for forms, they are the substance itself as it appears, that is as it enters the world. And as for conventions, they are what is agreed upon, that is they are consents, and are good things if they are consents to good things. The third value is “the need to be themselves.” But it is not made clear what self it is that the young person should realize and in which he should recognize his identity: there are in fact many selves in a free nature, which can be transformed into many guises. The true self does not demand that the young person realize himself any old how but that he he transformed and even become other than he is. The words of the Gospel, furthermore, will bear no gloss: abneget semetipsum. The day before, the Pope had been exhorting to metanoa. So then, is it realize yourself or transform yourself? The fourth value is an enthusiasm “to live and interpret your own times.” The Pope, however, offers the young people no interpretative key to their own times, since he does not point out that from the religious point of view, man must seek out the non-ephemeral among the ephemeral things of his own time, that is, seek out the last end that perdures through it all. Having thus developed his argument without any explicitly religious reference, Paul VI somewhat unexpectedly concludes by saying: “We think that in this interior search of yours you notice the need for God.” The Pope is here certainly speaking speculatively rather than with his authority as teacher.

Teilhard, Universalism, and the little word 'hell'

Elliot Bougis, "On Excluding Exclusion and the Inclusion Delusion: A Few Things to Know and Share" (1P5, November 6, 2015): Leo XIII: "There can be nothing more dangerous than those heretics who admit nearly the whole cycle of doctrine, and yet by one word, as with a drop of poison, infect the real and simple faith taught by our Lord and handed down by Apostolic tradition’…."

[Hat tip to JM]