Sunday, February 01, 2009

Political items

  • Charles Krauthammer, "Obama's Unnecessary Apology" (Real Clear Politics, January 30, 2009):
    WASHINGTON -- Every new president flatters himself that he, kinder and gentler, is beginning the world anew. Yet, when Barack Obama in his inaugural address reached out to Muslims with "to the Muslim world, we seek a new way forward, based on mutual interest and mutual respect," his formulation was needlessly defensive and apologetic.

    Is it "new" to acknowledge Muslim interests and show respect to the Muslim world? Obama doesn't just think so, he said so again to millions in his al-Arabiya interview, insisting on the need to "restore" the "same respect and partnership that America had with the Muslim world as recently as 20 or 30 years ago."

    Astonishing. In these most recent 20 years -- the alleged winter of our disrespect of the Islamic world -- America did not just respect Muslims, it bled for them. It engaged in five military campaigns, every one of which involved -- and resulted in -- the liberation of a Muslim people: Bosnia, Kosovo, Kuwait, Afghanistan and Iraq.
  • George Neumayr, "Nancy Pelosi's Modest Proposal" (American Spectator, January 27, 2009):
    "It will reduces costs," Nancy Pelosi said on This Week, in reference to the "stimulus" rationale for sending millions of dollars to the states for "family planning."

    What would once have been considered an astonishingly chilly and incomprehensible stretch is now blandly stated liberal policy.

    The full title of Jonathan Swift's work, A Modest Proposal, was, For Preventing the Children of Poor People in Ireland From Being a Burden to their Parents or Country, and for Making Them Beneficial to the Public.

    Change a few of the words and it could be a Democratic Party policy paper. Swift suggested that 18th-century Ireland stimulate its economy by turning children into food for the wealthy. Pelosi proposes stimulating the U.S. economy by eliminating them.

    ... Population is the poverty, not the riches, of a country, according to the left. Never mind that the only developing countries are the ones with growing populations. No matter: While nature can grow unfettered, human nature is to be controlled at all costs. We must preserve everything purely except ourselves. We must send money to the UN to save rain forests and destroy humans.

    Pelosi's idea would have appealed to Swift at some level. Mocking the fashionable utilitarian theories of the day, he attributes his Modest Proposal to a "very knowing American of my acquaintance in London." He also had his own satirical notion of stimulus: have the poor be run "through a joint-stock company." Who knows what he would have done with TARP?
[Hat tip to Prof. E.E.]

Tridentine Community News, February 1, 2009

From the bulletin insert of St. Josaphat Catholic Church, Detroit, Tridentine Community News (February 1, 2009), this local assessment of the recent news about the revocation of the SSPX excommunications, along with other items of regional interest:
SSPX Bishops’ Excommunication Revoked

In a widely anticipated, though still in many ways unimaginable move, our Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI on January 21 revoked the excommunications of the four bishops whom Society of St. Pius X founder Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre had consecrated in 1988 without Pope John Paul II’s approval.

Let us be clear what this is and is not. It is a key step forward in working towards the eventual reconciliation of the SSPX with the Church. In conjunction with the previously issued Motu Proprio, Summórum Pontíficum, the removal of the excommunications provides the starting point for subsequent discussions.

The action did not in any way regularize the status of the SSPX itself. SSPX Masses continue to be valid, though illicit, as they are conducted without the approval of the diocesan bishop. Confessions and weddings conducted by an SSPX priest are invalid as well as illicit, as those two sacraments require jurisdiction, that is, the diocesan bishop must specifically approve faculties for a priest to perform these sacraments. The July 13, 2008 edition of this column, available on-line, treated these subjects in greater detail.

There are theological and temporal issues to be addressed next. The SSPX has serious problems with certain teachings from Vatican II, such as the document on Religious Liberty. They have also amassed significant real estate and financial holdings which they are unlikely to turn over casually to the authority of a diocesan bishop, especially one with a track record of being unsympathetic to tradition. But our Holy Father’s first two moves had to happen before more detailed issues were addressed. God willing, the talks will continue.

We must give credit to His Eminence, Dario Cardinal Castrillón Hoyos, the president of the Pontifical Commission Ecclésia Dei. He has embraced the challenge of working to regularize the SSPX. Because Cardinal Castrillón is at retirement age, let us pray that our Holy Father appoints a successor to His Eminence who shares his zeal for this work.

History will likely acknowledge that the SSPX played a key role in the restoration of the Tridentine Mass to the life of the Church. Circa 1982, a lengthy article in the now-defunct Monthly Detroit magazine described the SSPX and its Redford chapel in sympathetic terms; it was this writer’s first exposure to the Tridentine Mass. Even if certain people did not want to associate themselves with the SSPX, the Society did at least make people aware of the existence and beauty of the Traditional Liturgy, so they could work for its reintroduction in other ways.

It is also important to recognize the efforts of countless souls who have worked within the Church’s structures for the same goal, no matter how challenging that might be at times. A great number of the Extraordinary Form Mass sites we now see have been founded because of the dedication and hard work of priests and laity who simply believe the Classic Liturgy to be an appealing form of worship. They have no agenda other than prayer. Indeed, the SSPX and its kin have sometimes tarnished the reputation of such groups before they can even be established and have actually hindered their work.

The issue of the SSPX transcends any one person or any one congregation. A given bishop may have made ludicrous and imprudent statements, and a given congregation may seem to be pugnacious or relish being independent of the Holy See, but that is not justification for keeping the whole group out. Heaven knows, strange and disloyal-to-Rome statements and actions have come out of some bishops, theologians, and congregations who are part of diocesan structures. The Church is comprised of sinners; imperfection is everywhere.

So what can we do now? Offer our prayers and rosaries for unity in the Church. Trust in the Holy Ghost and our Holy Father to do the right things, at the right pace, for such a large-scale issue.

Reminder – Bishop Boyea Mass on Feburary 15

On Sunday, February 15 at 4:00 PM at All Saints Church in Flint, Michigan, Bishop Earl Boyea will celebrate his first Tridentine Holy Mass as Bishop of the Diocese of Lansing. All Saints is located one block east of I-75 at the Pierson Road exit, north of downtown Flint.

Correction

Thanks to the reader who brought to our attention conclusive proof that on the “Feria After the Epiphany” Monday, January 12, the Mass of the “First Sunday After Epiphany” should have been celebrated instead of the Mass of the Feast of the Holy Family, which is the mass of the “first Sunday After Epiphany”. The argument we made two weeks ago in favor of the contrary position, no matter how logical, is not what the Church desires.

St. Agnes Church Debuts Extraordinary Form Mass

One of North America’s best-known parishes for Latin Liturgy, St. Agnes in St. Paul, Minnesota, has begun offering a Tridentine Mass on the First, Third, and Fifth Sundays of the month at 10:00 AM. On the Second and Fourth Sundays, this Mass continues to be a Novus Ordo Latin Mass, celebrated ad oriéntem. We encourage anyone visiting the Minneapolis-St. Paul area to make a stop at St. Agnes to experience an often standing-room-only Mass accompanied by one of the most elaborate music programs in North America. Numerous orchestral Masses are offered throughout the year. For more information, go to www.stagnes.net

[Comments? Ideas for a future column? Please e-mail tridnews@stjosaphatchurch.org. Previous columns are available at www.stjosaphatchurch.org. This edition of Tridentine Community News, with minor editions, is from the St. Josaphat bulletin insert for January 18, 2009. Hat tip to A.B.]

"We Laugh Because We Believe"

"We Laugh Because We Believe" ... That, of course, is the slogan of Creative Minority Report, whose post I had not seen from last July, "Marketing the 'New' New Mass," until I saw the image linked Fr. Zuhlsdorf's post of January 29. 2009. Thus, in Fr. Z's words, "to lighten things up a bit" ... Get the full story of the creator of this dandy piece of "marketing," which the author fully expected to elicit a phone call from an interested Vatican! Read the article (linked above) in full.

Related
Fr. Zuhlsdorf, "A priest writes: 'let’s hang up the "old Mass"’"

Woo-woo! We get national coverage

My son, Christopher, just emailed me to tell me that a page of "Times Topics" (New York Times, February 1, 2008) devoted to Pope Benedict XVI, has a section entitled "Headlines Around the Web," which carries five links, the last two of which are to posts on his and my blogs.

I dunno. I've never felt this way before. Of course, I've never been even remotely connected with the New York Times. I think it's all going to my head. I suddenly have this feeling of ... HOPE! Yes, we CAN do it! I wonder if President Obama would even shake my hand now! The possibilities are endless! Now, at last, I really count for something in this world!! Dare one hope: maybe even ... Al Gore ... would sign his autograph for me now!!!
Headlines Around the Web

The Associated Press
February 1, 2009
Pope's Bishop Pick Criticized Over Katrina Comment

Boston Globe
February 1, 2009
From Rome to Jerusalem

Catholic Exchange
February 1, 2009
Holy Father's February Prayer Intentions

Against The Grain
January 31, 2009
The Vatican, The SSPX and the Repeal of the Excommunications - A Roundup

Musings of a Pertinacious Papist
January 31, 2009
Cardinal: SSPX leader 'recognizes Vatican II'

Saturday, January 31, 2009

The Four Ends of the Mass

A reader writes:
After being taken to task for negativity, I stopped and asked myself, Well, what have been the stronger positive statements of basic Catholicism I have seen? It is not like the book reviews in the NOR offer much in terms of non-technical reading or inspiring. Since Kreeft, in his helpful and encouraging Jesus-Shock, gives a nod to the Baltimore Catechism, the reference there flashed me back to Foley's citing of it here [see below].

Somewhere [Fr.] Louis Bouyer writes that the challenge now is to distill our message to fit onto a business card. What?! Almost sounds like an "I Found It!" campaign -- very, very unCatholic. And while the complexities of the Faith may indeed not be best conveyed when condensed, it does make one wonder if we have an incisive message beyond the essentially generic "Hope!" "Love!" campaigns afoot.

Foley's fourth point especially is thus one I liked in terms of how he tackled it. I think we need to hear a lot more of this sort of thing... and Pope Benedict seems somewhat so inclined.
The article to which the reader makes reference is Michael P. Foley's "The Mass and the Four Most Important Lessons of Childhood" (Scripture and Catholic Tradition, February 1, 2009). The article begins thus:
The four principal ends of the Mass are also the four most important things to teach our children—and ourselves.

One of the questions of the old Baltimore Catechism is, "What are the purposes for which the Mass is offered?" The answer given was fourfold:
  • First, to adore God as our Creator and Lord.
  • Second, to thank God for His many favors.
  • Third, to ask God to bestow His blessings on all men.
  • Fourth, to satisfy the justice of God for the sins committed against Him.
Adoration, thanksgiving, petition, and satisfaction—mention of these four ends found their way into many an old missal and are still a familiar feature of any traditional catechesis on the Mass. What is often overlooked, however, is the relation of these ends to our own concrete lives as human beings. How exactly do these four things relate to our psychological, emotional, and spiritual welfare?

One way to approach this question is to consider the four most important things that we learn to say as children: "I love you," "Thank you," "Please," and "I’m sorry." These four simple sayings are not only capable of directing both young and old onto the path toward human happiness; they also provide a useful analogy for what happens at every Sacrifice of the Mass.
The entire article is well worth reading, as any of you know who may be familiar with Professor Foley's writing.

[Hat tip to J.M.]

SSPX: from the Welborn mosh pit

A reader writes:
"Over at open book [Amy Welborn's blog, now "Charlotte Was Both"], bracing back and forths on the SSPX deal.

http://amywelborn.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/lefebvre-part-ii/#comment-11358

I attended a non-schismatic Latin Mass a while back, and was both intrigued, attracted, and a bit repelled. So I don't mean this as a Trad shout out at all. But i thought these comments in the com box by trp were on point:
The comment in question reads as follows:
The Vatican could have put together lots of neat PR packets for the press, and the headlines would have been the same. I, for one, appreciate the Vatican’s indifference to the MSM. The facts are out there, easily accessible to any journalist; it’s really their fault if they are utterly uninterested in discovering them.

The rejection by the SSPX of V2 is, for me, a non-starter. More than half of my parish rejects the basics of the Catholic faith. “The Trinity? You’ve got to be kidding me! What are you, a traditionalist or something?” Should they be summarily excommunicated? And if you are going to start with the rebellious clerics; well, there’s Father McBrian and plenty others where he comes from. If you were to distribute a doctrinal check list, I suspect that the SSPX–priests, bishops, and laity–would score better than the average Catholic in good standing.

Archbishop Williamson’s statements are foolish, probably sinful, and an embarrassment to all traditionalists. However, they cannot compare in gravity to the sins of prelates who have not been relieved of their duties. If you compare him with Abp Mahony, for example, you will likely find that the latter has done far more real harm. The secular press can continue with their nonsense, but I will not be more upset about Abp Williamson than I am about Abp Mahony. I hope that both will disappear from the scene.

Here’s the really painful point to make: the SSPX may not want full communion, and they may be right not to want it. Thanks to the brilliant and holy Benedict XVI, it is now becoming mainstream to question the idea that the authentic liturgy and doctrine of the Church was born the 1960’s, and that everything that was taught and believed before that decade was a bunch of superstitious, bigoted nonsense. We have also begun to undo some of the brutal iconoclasm that has devastated our churches, art, music, and liturgy. However, we’ve made baby steps. None of it would have been possible without the SSPX’s rebellion. I can understand why even reasonable factions of the SSPX might now be very diffident about submitting themselves to the authority of the current hierarchy of the Church. They have Pope Benedict as their ally; but he has many, many enemies who hate the SSPX, and hate everything that they have managed stubbornly to preserve.
[Hat tip to J.M.]

Cardinal: SSPX leader 'recognizes Vatican II'

Damian Thompson, "The drama continues: head of SSPX 'recognises Vatican II', says Cardinal Castrillon" (Telegraph.co.uk, January 29, 2009):

Now that Bishop Williamson has been punished and silenced, Pope Benedict XVI's grand design for the reunion of orthodox Catholic Christianity is going according to plan. Cardinal Castrillon, head of Ecclesia Dei, has just been quoted as saying that Bishop Fellay, head of the SSPX, recognises the Second Vatican Council. Amazing. (Hat-tip: the great Father Z.)

So, in the course of one day, we learn that a personal prelature is on offer to hundreds of thousands of members of the Traditional Anglican Communion, and that the leader of the SSPX, which in the past has portrayed Vatican II as the work of Satan, now accepts the broad thrust of the Council. (One curious detail: it seems possible that the Vatican didn't know that Richard Williamson was a gibbering Holocaust denier until after the decision to lift the excommunications had been taken. Not very clever, though I personally couldn't care less what "communities minister" Sadiq Khan has to say on the subject.)

Admittedly, there are many obstacles to be overcome, some arising from the instability of the SSPX and the TAC, and others deliberately strewn in the path of the Holy Father by cardinals and . . .

[Hat tip to New Oxford Review News Link]

Report: Pope may welcome Traditional Anglicans

Plans could mean mass exodus from the Church of England: "Healing the Reformation's fault lines" (The Record, January 28, 2009:
History may be in the making. It appears Rome is on the brink of welcoming close to half a million members of the Traditional Anglican Communion into membership of the Roman Catholic Church, writes Anthony Barich. Such a move would be the most historic development in Anglican-Catholic relations in the last 500 years. But it may also be a prelude to a much greater influx of Anglicans waiting on the sidelines, pushed too far by the controversy surrounding the consecration of practising homosexual bishops, women clergy and a host of other issues.

It is understood that the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has decided to recommend the Traditional Anglican Communion be accorded a personal prelature akin to Opus Dei, if talks between the TAC and the Vatican aimed at unity succeed.
[Hat tip to New Oxford Review News Link]

"The Coming Evangelical Collapse"

Michael Spencer, "My Prediction: The Coming Evangelical Collapse (1)" (Internet Monk.com, January 27, 2009):
I’m not a Prophet or a Prophet’s Son. I can’t see the future. I’m usually wrong. I’m known for over-reacting. I have no statistics. You probably shouldn’t read this. The “Gracious God” post depressed me.

Part 1: The Coming Evangelical Collapse, and Why It Is Going to Happen
Part 2: What Will Be Left When Evangelicalism Collapses?
Part 3: Is This A Good Thing?



My Prediction

I believe that we are on the verge- within 10 years- of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity; a collapse that will follow the deterioration of the mainline Protestant world and that will fundamentally alter the religious and cultural environment in the West. I believe this evangelical collapse will happen with astonishing statistical speed; that within two generations of where we are now evangelicalism will be a house deserted of half its current occupants, leaving in its wake nothing that can revitalize evangelicals to their former “glory.”

The party is almost over for evangelicals; a party that’s been going strong since the beginning of the “Protestant” 20th century. We are soon going to be living in a very secular and religiously antagonistic 21st century in a culture that will be between 25-30% non-religious.

This collapse, will, I believe, herald the arrival of an anti-Christian chapter of the post-Christian west and will change the way tens of millions of people see the entire realm of religion. Intolerance of Christianity will rise to levels many of us have not believed possible in our lifetimes, and public policy will become particularly hostile towards evangelical Christianity, increasingly seeing it as the opponent of the good of individuals and society.

The response of evangelicals to this new environment will be a revisiting of the same rhetoric and reactions we’ve seen since the beginnings of the current culture war in the 1980s. The difference will be that millions of evangelicals will quit: quit their churches, quit their adherence to evangelical distinctives and quit resisting the rising tide of the culture.

Many who will leave evangelicalism will leave for no religious affiliation at all. Others will leave for an atheistic or agnostic secularism, with a strong personal rejection of Christian belief and Christian influence. Many of our children and grandchildren are going to abandon ship, and many will do so saying “good riddance.”

This collapse will cause the end of thousands of ministries. The high profile of Christian media will be reduced, if not eliminated. Hundreds of thousands of students, pastors, religious workers, missionaries and persons employed by ministries and churches will be unemployed or employed elsewhere. Christian schools will go into rapid decline. Visible, active evangelical ministries will be reduced to a small percentage of their current size and effort.

Nothing will reanimate evangelicalism to its previous levels of size and influence. The end of evangelicalism as we know it is close; far closer than most of us will admit.

My prediction has nothing to do with a loss of eschatological optimism. Far from it. I’m convinced the grace and mission of God will reach to the ends of the earth. But I am not optimistic about evangelicalism, and I do not believe any of the apparently lively forms of evangelicalism today are going to be the answer. In fact, one dimension of this collapse, as I will deal with in the next post, is the bizarre scenario of what will remain when evangelicals have gone into decline.

I fully expect that my children, before they are 40, will see evangelicalism at far less than half its current size and rapidly declining. They will see a very, very different culture as far as evangelicalism is concerned.

I hope someone is going to start preparing for what is going to be an evangelical dark age.

Why Is This Going To Happen?

1) Evangelicals have identified their movement with the culture war and with political conservatism. This was a mistake that will have brutal consequences. They are not only going to suffer in losing causes, they will be blamed as the primary movers of those causes. Evangelicals will become synonymous with those who oppose the direction of the culture in the next several decades. That opposition will be increasingly viewed as a threat, and there will be increasing pressure to consider evangelicals bad for America, bad for education, bad for children and bad for society.

The investment of evangelicals in the culture war will prove out to be one of the most costly mistakes in our history. The coming evangelical collapse will come about, largely, because our investment in moral, social and political issues has depleted our resources and exposed our weaknesses. We’re going to find out that being against gay marriage and rhetorically pro-life (yes, that’s what I said) will not make up for the fact that massive majorities of evangelicals can’t articulate the Gospel with any coherence and are believing in a cause more than a faith.

2) Evangelicals have failed to pass on to our young people the evangelical Christian faith in an orthodox form that can take root and survive the secular onslaught. In what must be the most ironic of all possible factors, an evangelical culture that has spent billions of youth ministers, Christian music, Christian publishing and Christian media has produced an entire burgeoning culture of young Christians who know next to nothing about their own faith except how they feel about it. Our young people have deep beliefs about the culture war, but do not know why they should obey scripture, the essentials of theology or the experience of spiritual discipline and community. Coming generations of Christians are going to be monumentally ignorant and unprepared for culture-wide pressures that they will endure.

Do not be deceived by conferences or movements that are theological in nature. These are a tiny minority of evangelicalism. A strong core of evangelical beliefs is not present in most of our young people, and will be less present in the future. This loss of “the core” has been at work for some time, and the fruit of this vacancy is about to become obvious.

3) Evangelical churches have now passed into a three part chapter: 1) mega-churches that are consumer driven, 2) churches that are dying and 3) new churches that whose future is dependent on a large number of factors. I believe most of these new churches will fail, and the ones that do survive will not be able to continue evangelicalism at anything resembling its current influence. Denominations will shrink, even vanish, while fewer and fewer evangelical churches will survive and thrive.

Our numbers, our churches and our influence are going to dramatically decrease in the next 10-15 years. And they will be replaced by an evangelical landscape that will be chaotic and largely irrelevant.

4) Despite some very successful developments in the last 25 years, Christian education has not produced a product that can hold the line in the rising tide of secularism. The ingrown, self-evaluated ghetto of evangelicalism has used its educational system primarily to staff its own needs and talk to itself. I believe Christian schools always have a mission in our culture, but I am skeptical that they can produce any sort of effect that will make any difference. Millions of Christian school graduates are going to walk away from the faith and the church.

There are many outstanding schools and outstanding graduates, but as I have said before, these are going to be the exceptions that won’t alter the coming reality. Christian schools are going to suffer greatly in this collapse.

5) The deterioration and collapse of the evangelical core will eventually weaken the missional-compassionate work of the evangelical movement. The inevitable confrontation between cultural secularism and the religious faith at the core of evangelical efforts to “do good” is rapidly approaching. We will soon see that the good evangelicals want to do will be viewed as bad by so many, that much of that work will not be done. Look for evangelical ministries to take on a less and less distinctively Christian face in order to survive.

6) Much of this collapse will come in areas of the country where evangelicals imagine themselves strong. In actual fact, the historic loyalties of the Bible belt will soon be replaced by a de-church culture where religion has meaning as history, not as a vital reality. At the core of this collapse will be the inability to pass on, to our children, a vital evangelical confidence in the Bible and the importance of the faith.

7) A major aspect of this collapse will happen because money will not be flowing towards evangelicalism in the same way as before. The passing of the denominationally loyal, very generous “greatest generation” and the arrival of the Boomers as the backbone of evangelicalism will signal a major shift in evangelical finances, and that shift will continue into a steep drop and the inevitable results for schools, churches, missions, ministries and salaries.

Next: What Will Be Left?
Related[Hat tip to S.F.]

Evening Prayer

O God, give me grace at this time duly to confess my sins before Thee, and truly to repent of them. Blot out of Thy book, gracious Lord, all my manifold acts of sin committed against Thee. Forgive me all my wanderings in prayer, my sins of omission, my deliberate sins against conscience.

Give me eyes to see what is right, and a heart to follow it, and strength to perform it; and grant that I may in all things press forward in the work of sanctification and ever do Thy will, and at length through Thy mercy attain to the glories of Thy everlasting Kingdom through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Oxford 1828

[Acknowledgement: A Newman Prayer Book (Vincent F. Blehl, S.J., 1990), p. v.]

Friday, January 30, 2009

Fr. Paul Berg (1922-2009)

One of our own priests at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, dearly beloved by the whole community, passed from this life on Monday, following a brief illness. At one time, much earlier in his life, he was the philosophy professor of Thomas Losoncy, whom I had as a professor during my M.A. program at Villanova University in Philadelphia in 1979-1980. Dr. Losoncy has long since retired, but Fr. Berg was still teaching philosophy at Sacred Heart and coaching the Seminary basketball team up into the fall semester of 2008. After games he could be seen surrounded by his students, nursing a bottle of beer in the seminarians' pub, which was affectionately named after him: O'Berg's. He was 87.

Fr. Berg was a taciturn, humble, and deeply compassionate priest. He was born and raised in Detroit, and, as far as I know, has been at the Seminary longer than anyone else now living there. He remembered details from the Civil Rights marches in Selma, Alabama in 1965. He was there. He lived through the Detroit riots of 1967, which began just blocks from the Seminary, and he knew all about the history, demographics, and race-relations of the city. He was all about the hospitality of reaching out to those in the surrounding community. He was also involved in the Irish-Catholic fraternal organization, the Ancient Order of Hibernians, was a die-hard fan of the Fighting Irish, and could be seen occasionally with his golf putter, practicing on the Seminary lawns. At the conclusion of each of his Masses at the Seminary, he would always leave us with a parting thought -- usually an apt word or phrase to help the point of his homily stick. At his funeral today at Sacred Heart, the church was packed with an overflow crowd. He will be missed.

See: Oralandar Brand-Williams, "Priest fought for civil rights" (The Detroit News, January 28, 2009): "Catholic cleric marched in Alabama, recruited students to participate; also taught at seminary."

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Philadelphia's Glorious Catholic Music History

By Lucy E. Carroll

Lucy E. Carroll, D.M.A., is organist and music director at the Carmelite Monastery in Philadelphia, where the choir, nuns, and congregation sing Latin chant and traditional music, and the choir sings old and new motets in Latin and English. She is creator of the "Church­mouse Squeaks" cartoons that appear in Adoremus Bulletin, and a frequent contributor of articles on sacred music and the liturgy. She is currently editing the Monastery Hymnal. She is also adjunct associate professor at Westminster Choir College of Rider University in Princeton, New Jersey. The historical data in this article was originally prepared for her doctoral dissertation, "Three Centuries of Song: Pennsylvania's Choral Composers 1681-1981" (Combs College of Music, Philadelphia, 1982). Some material was excerpted from her article "Hymns, Hymnals, Composers, and Choir Schools: Philadelphia's Historic Contribution to Catholic Liturgical Music" (Adoremus Bulletin, June 2004).

The Archdiocese of Philadelphia celebrated its bicentennial this year. The Catholic Standard and Times, the archdiocesan newspaper, published a special issue commemorating the two hundred years of archdiocesan history. This retrospective covered archdiocesan saints John Neumann and Katherine Drexel, and the founding of schools, parishes, and colleges. Pages and pages were given to the pride of the past two hundred years. Not one word was given to music.

Why keep our music history a secret? Philadel­phia's musical history is unique among the thirteen colonies. For decades, Philadelphia was at the forefront of Catholic liturgical music. Home to hymnal publishers, composers, musical societies, and at the center of American reform of liturgical music called for by Pope St. Pius X, the Archdiocese of Philadelphia has much of which to be proud.

Alas, the past glories put the present state of music into shadow. Contemporary, secular-style music is most prominent in this archdiocese. Not surprisingly, music is not given any pride of place in Philadelphia parishes: A survey of the archdiocesan directory, and a look at the parish Sunday bulletins, shows listings of priests, deacons, secretaries, grief counselors, business managers, parish nurses, and all manner of officers; nowhere does one find a music director or organist listed.

Some of the music of the past two centuries will sound outdated. Yet throughout its history -- before the changes following the Second Vatican Council -- Philadelphia's sacred-music leaders were trained in classical music rather than the popular song style of their day. They brought to liturgical music an excellence (in the classical standards of their time) and a sense of the sacred. Can that be said today?

So mired in musical mediocrity are today's parishes that a hope of a renewal of truly sacred Catholic music like the Gregorian renewal begun by Philadelphia's St. Gregory Guild of a century ago seems an impossible dream.

Once upon a time, Philadelphia was the only one of the thirteen colonies in which Catholics were permitted to worship openly. (Maryland was founded as a Catholic colony, but soon came under British rule and law. It became illegal to build a Catholic church in Maryland, so Catholics had to worship in private houses.) Under British rule, Catholicism was forbidden in Philadelphia, subject to imprisonment at the least. But William Penn's charter granting religious freedom in his colony continued to be honored during colonial days. Pennsylvania built the first Catholic churches in the U.S., and its music gained renown even among non-Catholics. John Adams attended a Catholic service in Philadelphia in 1774 and wrote, "Went in the afternoon, to the Romish Chapel in Philadelphia…. The scenery and the music are so calculated to take in mankind that I wonder the Reformation ever succeeded…. The chanting is soft and sweet."

High praise indeed! What would he think of today's mix of salsa, merengue, pop, and gospel? Would he think the Reformation's success bore fruit?

July 4, 1779, saw a remarkable event (remarkable, one thinks, even by today's secular standards): Official celebrations for the anniversary of the Declaration of Independence were held at Old St. Mary's Catholic Church. Among the participants were George Washington, the French ambassador Conrad-Alexandre Gérard, Gérard's chaplain, as well as several heads of state, members of Congress, and representatives of the French navy. The Gregorian chant setting of the Te Deum was sung. Can one even imagine a U.S. president today celebrating a national event in a Catholic Church, listening to Gregorian chant?

Because of its Catholic populace, Philadelphia became home to the first U.S. Catholic hymnal. Published in 1787 by John Aitken (1745-1831), the compilation was titled Litanies and Vesper Hymns and Anthems as They are Sung in the Catholic Church Adapted to the Voice and Organ. The music was scored for treble and bass; a later edition included a third vocal part. A Holy Mass of the Blessed Trinity was included, but, as was sadly customary at the time, some text was omitted and replaced with instrumental sections. Plainchant themes appeared in the Mass and some hymns, but the music -- again in the classical style of the time -- was greatly ornamented. While Aitken was not Catholic, he worked closely with Catholic leaders in preparing the book. The German parishioners of Holy Trinity Catholic Church helped to underwrite the cost of publication.

Soon thereafter, the second American Catholic hymnal appeared, by the first American Catholic publisher, also in Philadelphia. Matthew Carey (1769-1839) organized a Sunday School Society in Philadelphia beginning about 1790. Four years later, he published a Catholic catechism; later editions contained hymns.

The Philadelphia Musical Fund Society, begun in 1820, is the oldest extant music society in America. One of its founders, Benjamin Carr (1768-1831), became music director of St. Augustine's Catholic Church, which opened its doors in 1801. Four years later, Carr published Masses, Vespers, Litanies: Composed, Selected, and Arranged for the Use of the Catholic Churches in the United States of America. It was dedicated to Baltimore Bishop John Carroll (the first American bishop) and included Carr's original setting for the Mass and Te Deum. It was another landmark publication, and it introduced Adeste Fideles and O Sanctissima to American Catholics. Alas, his Mass settings also omitted some text phrases in the Gloria, a common practice at the time on both sides of the Atlantic.

The first American Sodality was begun in Philadelphia in 1841 by the Rev. Felix Barbelin (1808-1869). The Sodality movement had been approved by Pope Gregory XIII in 1684. Fr. Barbelin had been pastor of Old St. Joseph's Church for two decades. He founded St. Joseph's Hospital and was named president of St. Joseph's College in 1852. He prepared the first American Sodality Manual in 1841, which contained prayers and hymns. A plethora of Sodality hymnals appeared in the following years, such as Philadelphia's Sodalist's Manual in 1887. The Manual was prepared by E.F. McGonigle, and contained 120 hymns with music. So popular was this collection that it was reprinted in 1900, 1904, and 1905. Many of the Sodality hymns were of lesser musical quality, but they were intended for use in devotions and prayer meetings rather than the Mass, and for schools and amateur groups rather than church choirs.

Catholic music grew in Philadelphia's Catholic schools. As early as 1804 Philadelphia's Old St. Mary's Church established a singing school and a boy choir. Here is a bright light: today there is an Archdiocesan Boy Choir, directed by Tom Windfelter. Some eighty young men in this choir sing traditional Catholic choral music and chant, much of it in Latin. The choir has sung in such venues as Ávila, Spain, and Lourdes, France.

The Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur prepared The Wreath of Mary hymnal in 1884, and the Sunday School Hymn Book in 1887. While actually published by a Boston firm, the music was the work of Philadelphia nuns. Some of the hymns later found their way into the St. Basil Hymnal. Sisters of the Holy Child Jesus, also in Philadelphia, founded by Sr. Cornelia Connelly, prepared a hymnal in 1877 with over 100 English hymns and a few Latin motets, including the setting of O Salutaris Hostia by Anthony Werner, which is still used today.

Philadelphia poetess Eleanor C. Donnelly (1838-1917) published two volumes of original hymns to the Sacred Heart, in 1882 and 1912. Sentimentally Victorian in flavor, they still contained strong devotional aspects. Two of her hymn texts were "Sacred Heart, in Accents Burning" and "Like a Strong and Raging Fire."

Philadelphia was also home to a German-American immigrant who made a tremendous impact on Catholic sacred music in the 19th century. Albert RoSewig (he capitalized the "S" in his surname to be assured it would be pronounced correctly, with three syllables, not two) came to America at the age of ten in 1856 and served in the city until his death in 1929. He was director of music at St. Charles Borromeo Church for some thirty-five years. His reputation as composer and conductor was so great and widespread that he was selected as the conductor for the Centennial Chorus at the U.S. Centennial Exposition of 1876.

RoSewig wrote Masses, songs, hymns, and motets. In his day, "Little Brown Jug" and "Listen to the Mockingbird" were among Philadelphia's favorite songs. He did not, however, write in that popular song style, but in the classical style of his day, which was florid and sentimental. RoSewig had his own publishing company, and around 1880 he published Concentus Sacri. Popular in its day, it was later criticized by Catholic music reformers. As was popular in his time, RoSewig wrote romanticized rather than modal harmony for Gregorian chants, and even harmonized the priest's altar chants, something Pope St. Pius X later condemned. (Today it is still forbidden to accompany the priest's altar chants in any way.) Despite this, Concentus Sacri was a most popular publication and provided Catholic choirs with the works of such composers as Adam Geibel, Giacomo Rossini, Mozart, Donizetti, Bellini, Verdi, Gounod, and, of course, Albert RoSewig. While some of the music today may seem overly florid, it was in the best classical tradition of its day, and prompted the formation of large, musically capable Catholic choirs.

While he wrote in what he considered appropriate sacred style, RoSewig lived to hear his music condemned by Nicola Montani and the members of the St. Gregory Guild. Pius X banned overly operatic styles, and RoSewig must have been shattered to see his compositions dismissed as inappropriate for the very sphere for which they were written. He completely withdrew from the public the last decade of his life.

And what of that reform? In 1903 Pius X issued Tra le Sollecitudini, his motu proprio that restored pure Gregorian chant, encouraged polyphony, reaffirmed the use of Latin, and restricted musical style and instrumental usage for the next sixty years. In Philadelphia, Nicola Montani led the national reform of Catholic liturgical music.

Montani (1880-1949) was conductor, editor, composer, and publisher. He was founder of the St. Gregory Guild in Rittenhouse Square, spreading the message of Pius X's reform, and furnishing publications for that reform. Born in New York, he spent 42 of his 67 years in Philadelphia. He studied at Rome's St. Cecilia Conservatory in 1903, and in 1904 attended a school organized by the then-exiled monks of Solesmes on the Isle of Wight. From 1906 to 1923 he served at St. John the Evangelist Church in central Philadelphia. He also taught music at Hallahan High School, West Philadelphia Catholic Girls High School, and St. Mary's Academy. He served as editor-in-chief of liturgical music for both G. Schirmer and Boston Music Company publishers. Imagine, a Catholic music composer and editor who studied chant and read the Vatican documents. Mirabile dictu!

In 1914 Montani published the St. Gregory Hymnal and Catholic Choir Book, renewed in 1920 and 1947. He funded the cost of publication himself. In near-fanatic fervor, he also published a "White List" of recommended music, as well as an infamous "Black List" in 1922, naming music that did not meet -- in his estimation, anyway -- the high standards of Tra le Sol­lecitudini. Pius X had written that any modern music in the liturgy had to have "sanctity and goodness of form…. Contain nothing profane, be free from reminiscences of motifs adopted in thea­tres…and not be fashioned after the manner of profane pieces."

A century later, Pope John Paul II wrote his chirograph on sacred music, reminding Catholics that the 1903 work was still valid in essence: that the closer music was to Gregorian chant in form, the more suitable it was for the Mass, and vice versa. Alas, while Montani and his Society championed Pius X's 1903 document, John Paul's 2003 chirograph has been largely ignored.

Montani may have gone a bit over the line in delineating "liturgical style": He banned works by Mozart, Haydn, Schubert, Rossini, von Weber, and his predecessor, RoSewig. He did, however, edit and adapt those works, pruning them of what he considered superfluous aspects (arpeggiated chords, rhythmic accompaniments, ornamentation, etc.). It was rather like the taste of watered-down beer.

Montani's St. Gregory Hymnal received wide acceptance and influenced much of the country. Copies still appear for auction on eBay. A severely abridged version is available from GIA Publications, and the full hymnal itself is available in reprint. It can still be found in the choir lofts of a few Philadelphia churches, for it contained many accessible choral pieces in both Latin and English, arranged for two-part or four-part choirs. Montani's harmonization of chant was heavy-handed, and later criticized, and must take a back seat to the work of Achille Bragers.

Montani lives on, not only in old copies of his hymnal, but in a Guild publication titled The Correct Pronunciation of Latin According to the Roman Usage. This is still available from GIA Publications (buried deep, deep within the catalog). The manual had been recommended to all choir conductors, Catholic and otherwise, by no less a personage than the great Robert Shaw, dean of American choral directors. How ironic that this manual, designed for Catholic churches, is more often found today in the hands of secular concert choir directors.

Montani brought Philadelphia to the forefront in other ways. In 1915 his Palestrina Choir gave concerts of Renaissance polyphony in Philadelphia and New York, bringing this music to the ears of U.S. audiences. His choirs recorded this music for Victor Records, awakening an interest in polyphonic choral music in the rest of the country. He also organized the Choral Festival of Catholic Choirs and directed it for the U.S. Sesqui-Centennial Celebration in 1926. The St. Gregory Hymnal was put into Braille notation, the first hymnal of any kind to be prepared in Braille. For his work in Catholic liturgical music reform, Montani was named a Knight Commander of St. Sylvester by Pope Pius XI in 1926.

Other Philadelphi­ans also excelled in music for the liturgy. Sr. Mary Immaculée (1885-1965) of the Servants of the Immaculate Heart of Mary (in Immacu­lata, Pennsylvania) served as music director at Immacu­lata College for over twenty years. She was affiliated with the Society of St. Gregory and became noted as a composer of sacred works for women's choirs as well as traditional four-part mixed choirs. She was influential in bringing good liturgical music to the area, particularly in schools, and helped further the cause of women composers.

Sr. Regina Dolores of the Sisters of St. Joseph (in Chestnut Hill, Pennsylvania) graduated from the University of Pennsylvania, received a Master of Arts in organ from Notre Dame, and a Ph.D. in music from the Detroit Conservatory. She also studied harp at Philadelphia's still-famed Curtis Institute of Music. An outstanding performer, she was named Chair of the Music Department at Chestnut Hill College from the year the school opened in 1924 until her retirement in 1970. She was renowned as a conductor, composer, harpist, and organist. She was an officer of the St. Cecilia Guild, and wrote for the St. Gregory Society. She was a member of the Cardinal's Commission on Liturgical Music (no longer extant) and was president of the Pennsylvania State Unit of the National Catholic Music Educators Association.

Today, the reforms called for by Pius X, the true intent of the Second Vatican Council (as opposed to the interpretive "spirit of Vatican II"), and the reminders of Pope John Paul II and then-Cardinal Ratzinger are recognized only in sporadic bits and spurts within the archdiocese. No longer a leader in liturgical music, this archdiocese, like so many others, has fallen into the inclusive, multicultural bandwagon of inappropriate, secular-style music. What would John Adams, Nicola Montani, Sister Immaculée, Benjamin Carr, even Albert RoSewig think of the mediocrity and banality of so much liturgical music today? Ah, perhaps that is why the history of Philadelphia's leadership in Catholic sacred music has been kept under wraps.

One hopes that this great archdiocese abandons the pop-and-salsa style and once again leads the people in renewal of music for the sacred liturgy -- music that is sacred in nature, high in musical quality, suitable for the altar of sacrifice, and fitting for God's house.

[The forgoing article by Lucy E. Carroll, "Philadelphia's Glorious Catholic Music History," was original published in New Oxford Review (December 2008), and is reproduced here by kind permission of New Oxford Review, 1069 Kains Ave., Berkeley, CA 94706.]

Oh, come now.

Puh-leeeze!

Niraj Warikoo, writing in "Vigneron installed as new Detroit archbishop" (Detroit Free Press, January 28, 2009), infers from the fact that the new Archbishop, in his homily, repeatedly stressed "the importance of strictly adhering to church principles despite the prevailing culture," that this "clearly showed his traditionalist bent."

Come now. So what's this supposed to mean -- that disobeying church principles is "progressive"? Puh-leeeze. What Warikoo says about Vigneron here tell us more about Warikoo than about Vigneron. I would have thought that conscientious obedience to Mother Church was simply the mark of a good and faithful bishop, rather than something calling for polarizing labels. Then again, we live in times when everything, even the Eucharistic Sacrifice, has been politicized. Domine, miserere nobis.

Then again, maybe this was the proverbial needle in the haystack and nothing more than an honest and innocent journalistic mistake. Yu think?!

Newman Prayer Book

A reader recently wrote asking where one might be able to acquire the Newman prayer book, from which I have been offering excerpts recently. I sent an email in reply, but it was bounced back with "fatal errors," so I post the information here for anyone interested:

Here's the data I find in the prayer book --
Vincent Ferrer Blehl, S.J., editor, A Newman Prayer Book (Birmingham, UK: V.F. Blehl, S.J., 1990).
There is also the following information:
Publisher: V.F. Blehl, S.J., The Newman Secretariat, The Oratory, Hagley Road, Birmingham B16 8UE, England.
My hunch is that I purchased the booklet on a visit in 1999 to the Birmingham Oratory to visit the Newman Library there, where he lived. I would suggest writing to the Oratory directly at the address given and inquiring about the availability of the booklet for purchase.

The Oratory also has a website: http://www.birmingham-oratory.org.uk/ that may be worth exploring. I note that they do have a much larger collection of Newman's prayers available, listed online (though one would still have to write to them by regular mail to make the purchase). I don't see the particular prayer book I've been using listed (which is a very small booklet of only 33 pages); but it may be available if you contact them.

There is a "Contact Us" link with both phone numbers and email addresses.

The only other place I can think that I may have purchased it is the London (Brompton) Oratory, which has a book shop in the church, but no online link.

Regardless, the booklet may not be ideal. For example, the editor changed Newman's second person pronouns ("Thee," Thy" "Thine) when addressing God to "you," "your" and "yours"), which accords with the horizontalizing contemporary chumminess toward the Almighty, but is hardly faithful to Newman's eloquent (and reverent) Victorian form.

There are other books of Cardinal Newman's prayers you may prefer. In the meantime, there are some of his most memorable prayers online, if you google for them, using "prayer" + "Cardinal" + "Newman" etc.

Wish I could be more help.