Showing posts with label Heresy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heresy. Show all posts

Monday, June 05, 2017

Fr. Rutler: Pentecost was not an occasion for 'Enthusiasm'


Fr. George W. Rutler's article, "Pentecost Was Not An Occasion for 'Enthusiasm'" (Crisis Magazine, June 1, 2017), has all the appearance of being timed in anticipation of the International Catholic Charismatic Renewal's celebration of it's Golden Jubilee on Pentecost Sunday.

After meandering through a number of typically learned and eloquent distractions, the irrepressible Fr. Rutler comes round to his thesis: how the Catholic Charismatic movement, like the Montanist enthusiasms of the ancient Church, is a heretical distortion. While "not unsympathetic toward the noble integrity of John Wesley," he writes, Monsignor Ronald Knox, in his masterwork entitled Enthusiasm, "holds up the spiritist movements from the second century Montanists to the latter day Quakers, Jansenists, and Quietists as examples of how people go to extremes to confuse themselves emotionally with the Holy Spirit."

Turning his attention to Phrygia of Asia Minor in what is now Turkey during the second century, Rutler writes:
A convert priest named Montanus stirred up a lot of excitement when he confused himself with the Holy Spirit and proclaimed various “prophecies” while in a trance like a sort of divine ventriloquist. In the manner of a typical fanatic so defined, he was confident that God would agree with him if only God had all the facts. In a languid and dissolute period, the local churches already having become formalistic and arid (contrary to romantic depictions of the uniform zeal of all early Christians, and not unlike the motivation of John Wesley to stir up the dormant Church of England), the ardor of Montanus attracted many as far as North African and Rome itself, not all of whom were innocent of neurosis. Even the formidable mind of Tertullian welcomed it. Sensational outbursts of emotion were thought to be divinely inspired, and the formal clerical structure of the Church was caricatured as the sort of rigidity that quenches the spirit. Avowing that prophecy did not end with the last apostles, new messages were pronounced, false speaking in tongues pretending to be actual languages was encouraged, and women like Priscilla and Maximilla left their husbands and decided that they could be priestesses and prophetesses.

In the twentieth century, the Montanist heresy sprung up again. The Pentecostal sects, and even many Catholics were attracted to “re-awakenings” that gave the impression that the Paraclete promised by Christ who never lied had finally come awake having slumbered pretty much since the early days of the Church. While its extreme forms were bizarre, such as dancing in churches and uncontrolled laughter and barking like dogs while rolling on the floor, any quest for novelty quickly grows bored, for nothing goes out of fashion so fast as the latest fashion.

... Heresies are fads. The estimable Servant of God Father John Hardon, whose talks would never be called ecstatic, bluntly said that the modern Charismatics are Montanists. It is true that the Charismatic movement in the Catholic Church wisely was blessed insofar as it not denigrate from or add to authentic dogma. But in the second century the pope Eleutherius was inclined to condone the Montanists too, until the anti-Tertullian theologian Praxeas explained its problems.
More to it, of course, but that seems to be intended nub of something like a warning shot across the bow of the unbridled ubiquitous ebullience of the present season.

Tuesday, June 21, 2016

We need a Catholic rapper ...


Reminds me that I once had two black rappers in my ethics class in NC when we were discussing life issues. When they learned about the eugenics movement and Margaret Sanger and the nefarious origins of Planned Parenthood, they petitioned to create a rap song about the issues as a class project and did a bang-up job. I only wish I had a recording of it to pass along. They weren't Catholics, but they did a terrific job addressing the issues.

[Hat tip to JM]

Monday, June 13, 2016

"Saint Anthony, Hammer of Heretics, Help Us To Find Our Way Home To Heaven"

Christ or Chaos:
No Catholic who takes the salvation of his immortal soul seriously can ignore the intercessory power of Saint Anthony of Padua. Over and above all of the little things we ask Saint Anthony to find after we have lost them, Saint Anthony of Padua, an exemplary preacher of the truths of the Catholic Faith, must be invoked today in our times under one of his most important titles, "The Hammer of Heretics." We need Saint Anthony's help right now in the midst of the difficulties within Holy Mother Church so that each of us will be fortified by our hidden time in prayer before the Blessed Sacrament and our unabashed expressions of love for the Holy Name of Mary to proclaim the truths of the true Faith openly in the midst of the heretics in the counterfeit church of conciliarism who want to convince us that everything about the Catholic Church prior to the death of Pope Pius XII on October 9, 1958, must be rejected and vilified and apologized for. Although Saint Anthony is a saint for all days and for all ages, he is particularly apt to help Holy Mother Church in these our days, rife as they are with all of the synthesized heresies that have amalgamated themselves under the aegis of Modernism.
Read more >>

[Hat tip to L.S.]

Thursday, April 28, 2016

Just what the German hierarchy has been waiting for


Sandro Magister, "The German Option of the Argentine Pope" (www.chiesa, April 28, 2016): "Cardinal Kasper and the progressive wing of the Church of Germany have gotten what they wanted. On communion for the divorced and remarried, Francis is on their side. He made up his mind a while ago, and has acted accordingly."

Thursday, November 26, 2015

"Satanic verses" of the Qu'ran & Islam as a Christian heresy


Dante and Virgil meet Mohammed in Hell

Adfero, "Islam: A Christian heresy, straight from Hell" (RC, November 21, 2015):
Mohammad was a pedophile who received his false religion directly from Satan, as you will hear in this powerful sermon, delivered from a priest in good standing. Unfortunately, not many people, whether they be Christian or Muslim, know this anymore.

It doesn't matter how many ridiculous ecumenical events our bishops and priests attend bearing no good fruit and no converts. It doesn't matter how many times our modern popes offend God by entering mosques. It will never take away this undeniable fact: Islam is from Hell, and all who refuse to adhere to its evil are targets of its wrath.

Click here now to listen to the sermon. Then tell everyone you know.
The topmost priority here, evidently, is not "inter-religious dialogue"!

Related:

Friday, October 16, 2015

Appalling

Adfero, "Gentle Bishop Blaise: Sin all you want -- I'll still give you Communion" (Rorate Caeli, October 16, 2015)


As reader JM writes: "Did we not see this coming years back. Gay marriage is not 'premier' or 'best,' but it is something on which conscious is 'inviolable.' And now we must not only accompany but integrate and reconcile. Ambiguity always, always leads top erosion, which leads to foundational crumbling. Thankfully there is a strong media and lay attention to the Synod. But with rhetoric like this positioned against a traditionalist response that keys to calling remarrieds 'adulterous,' who do you think is going to win the ad campaign."

[Hat tip to JM]

Saturday, March 28, 2015

"Pope Leo XIII speaks on the duty to fight openly against the Kasper Agenda"

Br. Alexis Bugnolo's application of Leo XIII's encyclical, Sapientiae Christianae, to the Kasper crisis in the Vatican and beyond (From Rome, March 26, 2015).

[Disclaimer: Rules 7-9]

[Hat tip to L.S.]

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

The age of laity in the Church? A new angle ...

"I was pleased to see that some Catholic journalists and internet bloggers behaved as good soldiers of Christ and drew attention to this clerical agenda of undermining the perennial teaching of Our Lord."

- Bishop Athanasius Schneider, speaking on the October Synod of Bishops



"It was mainly by the faithful people that Paganism was overthrown ... the body of the Episcopate was unfaithful to its commission, while the body of the laity was faithful to its baptism ..."

- Blessed John Henry Newman, addressing what transpired
during the Arian heresy of the 4th century



"Treachery like that of Nestorius is rare in the Church, but it may happen that some pastors keep silence for one reason or another in circumstances when religion itself is at stake. The true children of Holy Church at such times are those who walk by the light of their baptism, not the cowardly souls who, under the specious pretext of submission to the powers that be, delay their opposition to the enemy in the hope of receiving instructions which are neither necessary nor desirable."

- Abbot Guéranger, commenting on the Nestorian controversy
in the 5th century, in The Liturgical Year, IV, p. 380.

[Hat tip to M.V. and L.S.]

Sunday, December 14, 2014

Iconoclasm - Muslim, Protestant, and Catholic

Fr. Ray Blake, "Happy St John Damascene Day" (Fr. Ray Blake's Blog, December 5, 2014)

St. John Damascene Priest and Doctor of the ChurchHappy St John Damascene day!
I don't know if it is by accident or design that he is celebrated during Advent, but he is one of the great defenders of the Incarnation.

I thought I would have fun this morning, w3e had a class of 9/10 year olds in for Mass this morning, so I tried explaining iconoclasm and iconophilia to them.
https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/815/flashcards/923815/jpg/picture151324159897291.jpg
St John of course was a resident of Damascus, in Syria which until 636 had been a Christian city, John was born 10 years after it conquest by Islam. It is worth noting that the Koran says more about Jesus than Mohamed, it is Jesus, not Mohamed who will come as judge at the end of time. Islam denies the idea that God could ever become Man and could suffer and die on the cross.

St John saw Islam as being a Christian heresy, a re-capitulation and extension of Arianism, which ends up by denying God's ability to transcend himself and become one with his creation. The doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation affirm God becomes one with us, he descends to us, becoming Man, and raises us up so the we might become Divinised. For Islam at best man may become a servant or slave of God, but never a Son.

Iconoclasm is more than denying that God can be portrayed, on its simplest level it is about the destruction of icons but underlying that thought is a dis-ease with the notion that God can become one with us, that he can be seen in flesh and blood, the next stage of course is to deny that Holy Eucharist or the Sacraments can be a meeting with the Divine, and beyond that, that we cannot encounter sanctifying Grace.



A RE-ORDERING AT JOSEPHIUM , OHIO
The Protestantism of the 16th Century was the Wests Iconoclastic crisis, the Counter Reformation the triumph the Iconophiles. Perhaps our problem is that in the West we have never quite taken Second Council of Nicaea seriously enough and so the period after the Vatican II becomes another period of Iconoclasm. It can be seen literally in the purposeful destruction of imagery in churches.

 More than that, it has lead to the profanation of the Sacred Liturgy, to reducing the sacraments to something self referential, to seeing the Church as something quite human rather than of Divine origin and end, and of God's presence in the world. It sees the priesthood and episcopate as mere jobs that even someone in serious sin can do.

Vatican PopeIn many ways the Extra-ordinary Synod on the Family was a battle between iconoclasts and iconophiles, those who believe marriage is an image of the unbreakable union of Christ and his Church and those who don't.

There is an iconophile mindset that always wants to see the image of God and experience his presence, just as there is an iconoclastic mindset wants to move away from God and to shut him out. Iconoclasm is dangerous. |Euthanasia and abortion become so easy if we do not see in the vulnerable the image of God.

I am concerned by a iconoclastic mindset in the Church, not only does it 'wreckovate buildings' but it excludes images of Christ and ultimately the person of Christ from the Church's life, I was given some posters recently to be distributed advertising a Catholic event, lots of pictures of bishops, none of Christ: that is an iconoclastic mindset.

[Hat tip to Sir A.S.]

Thursday, November 20, 2014

Who are the real "Promethean Neo-Pelagians" today?

One of our astute readers recently pointed out that the confusion over recent statements about "self-absorbed promethean neo-pelagians" might be allayed a bit by referencing the following reflections on the issue by a reputable Catholic priest, posted by Adfero, "Confused how some Catholics can be labeled 'Pelagians'?" (RC, August 4, 2013).  [Adfero's introduction (in blue), the priest's reflection (in red)]  The first part of the reflection reviews the historical heresy known as "Pelagianism."  The balance of the article is devoted to noting contemporary instantiations of "Pelagianism" that come from some perhaps unexpected quarters:

Recently, there's been a lot of fingerpointing at traditional Catholics. Some of it is the same old, same old (insert stale Pharisees joke here). Some of it, however, is very new and very confusing. 

Some Catholics have recently been identified -- more than once -- as "Pelagians." 

This will undoubtedly bolster the morale of other Catholics while, yet again, making life next to impossible for the traditional-minded parish priest who is, now more than ever, being accused by his flock of putting himself "above the Church" by his devotion to reverence in the liturgy and traditional Catholic teaching.  

Below, you will find a very interesting retort (notes) from a Catholic priest, who is in full communion:
11th Sunday after Pentecost 
“by the grace of God I am what I am, and His grace in me has not been fruitless.”
Recently, there has been some mentioning of the ancient heresy called Pelagianism. I have heard this term used a number of times in recent months and it seems some confusion has surrounded its employment. So, without passing any judgment on those who are using the term, let us take some time this Sunday to look into this ancient heresy. If we do this well, we might be surprised at how relevant this matter really is today.

Friday, November 14, 2014

Who would have dreamed of such things?

[Advisory & disclaimer: See Rules 7-9]

An article, now, by James V. Schall, S.J., "On Heretical Popes" (The Catholic Thing, November 11, 2014); and even a "Petition to the Cardinals of the Roman Church regarding the grave improprieties of Pope Francis." (ipetitions, November 11, 2014). Unbelievable. Who would have dreamed of such things appearing in print only several years ago?

And here is Michael Voris promoting, and trying to walk, The Razor's Edge dividing errors of the two opposite extremes:


[Hat tip to L.S.]

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Impressive French theological contortionist demonstrates how indissolubility of marriage can co-exist with pardonable divorce and re-marriage

This guy out-performs the Jesuits in casuist gymnastics. In fact he manages to square the circle, and -- voilà!! -- Behold! a round square! Something I'm not sure even God is capable of producing on a good day. Eee-haw!


Msgr. Jean-Paul Vesco, bishop of Oran

"Bishop offers a solution on Catholic divorce and remarriage" (Global Pulse, September 28, 2014):
In a text published on the website of the weekly magazine La Vie, Msgr. Jean-Paul Vesco, bishop of Oran in Algeria,proposes a theological and legal solution for Catholics who have divorced and remarried.

Msgr. Vesco, former Prior Provincial of the Dominicans in France, and bishop of Oran since 2012, discussed his position in an interview that accompanies his text. He states: “I firmly believe that it is theologically possible to assert the indissolubility of real conjugal love and the uniqueness of sacramental marriage, and at the same time the possibility of pardon in the event that lifelong marriage – one of life’s most beautiful but perilous adventures – fails.
Follow the good Msgr. Bishop Vesco through his tortured theological contortions if you wish -- Read more here >> For my part, I will continue to pray for the state of the Church and the discernment of her shepherds.


"Solution," my left foot!

Sunday, May 11, 2014

On unmasking saboteurs of the Faith before their damage becomes fatal


At all times civilization has its enemies, though they are constantly changing their guise and their weapons. The great defensive art is to detect and unmask them before the damage they inflict becomes fatal.

– Paul Johnson, Enemies of Society

"ON THE IDENTIFICATION OF HERETICS" (Heresy Hunter, February 8, 2009):
I. The word heretic is derived from the Greek word hairetikos, basically meaning someone that chooses or selects. In the matter of Roman Catholicism, then, a heretic is one that extricates a particular idea from its traditional system, or a suite of them, and subsequently utilizes them to develop, explicate and disseminate his own variant of religion, theology or church. Resultantly, a "new” or “alternative” cornerstone is erected so as to induct another spiritual movement, or to misdirect others for whatever reason, or simply to challenge the orthodox establishment either by academic argumentation or public pronouncement.

II. Now there are some unfailing rules which permit for the identification of the modern heretic. One is that, when he commences to formally speak or write about his new system, he will, upon observation or tonality in speech, have the semblance of self–assuredness in extremis. He will emanate an affected sense of possessing the truth. His mannerisms and writing style will exhibit a strong measure of confidence which, in most instances, is indicative of excessive pride. He will even candidly declare to be unorthodox, being elated with his courage as it were, gloating along the way, while feigning a concern for the believing population who have, in his view, been deluded for too many centuries as to the real meanings and attending subtleties of Roman Catholicism. In actuality, however, a little mining into the subsurface of his personal psychology will demonstrate that such a condition is merely expressive of an unvoiced and internalized contempt for the longsuffering Catholic tradition – that has endured and defended itself from false accusations, onslaughts, chaos, corruptions and intrigues for over two millennia. But even more so, it is an arrogation against the ardently faithful in the lay community who have not, in the heretics mind, the testicular fortitude nor the intellectual aptitude to dispute, defeat and finally eradicate the “impositions” of dogma set down by rightful ecclesiastical authority… and it is this very self–appeasing defiance that magnetizes people to him. “Who is this fellow?”, they ask; “I have never considered that view before”, they muse; “He has something there”, they conclude – and so the contagion actuates. His personal enigmatics, the astonishing alternative that is proposed, the definiteness in writing style, the certitude in enunciation, and his condescension against all those who counter or query him as to his motives and justifications – these are some of the traits by which one can fingerprint the heretic. Moreover, if the heretic comes under increased scrutiny from the defenders of orthodoxy, if he begins to feel greater pressures from the counterpositionings of Catholic authorities, and if he deems these as plausibly ruinous to his objectives, the heretic will respond – and this is one of his greatest tricks – by arguing that those very things he has been accused of, or considered to be, are part and parcel of that condition which sustains Roman Catholic tradition and authority. He will declare that ecclesiastical authorities exude a false sense of inner knowingness and conviction, that they are too self–assured, that they make it as if the truth in their possession, that they have continuously – and for “too long!” – been disingenuous to the faithful. It may appear this way to the heretic or disinterested external observer – and it is obviously a trait of orthodoxy (sure, there are sporadic internal thoughts of doubt); nevertheless, it originates from a factor altogether different from what the heretic presumes. The heretic will cry that no man can really represent the Word of God on earth. He will call such claims and beliefs to be proof of “self–righteousness”, “idolatry”, “pride”, “mass deception”, and so on.
Read more >>

[hat tip to L.S.]

Friday, May 09, 2014

Jesus in Mormonism

Trent Horn, "Evangelizing Mormons" (Catholic Answers, May 8, 2014), has an insightful remark in a conversation with a Mormon:
“You guys said in your presentation that Jesus is our “eldest brother.” You see, I believe that Jesus is my Lord and God and that he is co-equal and co-eternal with the Father. You believe, in contrast, that the Father created Jesus and so you don’t pray to Jesus. I love being a Christian and I would miss my relationship with Jesus if I joined the Mormon Church.” The young men had never heard this particular objection before and promised to study the issue in further detail.
Nice.

[Hat tip to JM]

Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Women Religious and the 'New' Cosmology

Ann Carey, "Women Religious and the New Cosmology" (National Catholic Register, February 18, 2014):
New-Age spirituality is often thought of as a fad from the 1960s and 1970s that went out of vogue long ago. However, among some Catholics, including some members of religious orders, New-Age spirituality still is being promulgated — and its proponents are becoming more overtly critical of Catholic doctrine....

In 2003, the Pontifical Councils for Culture and Interreligious Dialogue issued the instruction "Jesus Christ, the Bearer of the Water of Life: A Christian Reflection on the ‘New Age,’" calling New-Age spirituality "heterodox," distorting God’s word and replacing it with purely human words.

In spite of this clear instruction, a few New-Age concepts still are promoted vigorously in some Catholic circles. One of these concepts, called "the new cosmology," is being used to characterize Catholic doctrine as flawed because it allegedly is based on outmoded science. Variations of the new cosmology challenge belief in settled tenets of the Catholic faith, including the very nature of the Trinitarian God and the role of Jesus as Redeemer.

New cosmology also dismisses hierarchal order as well as so-called "dualisms" (defined as absolute truths). It holds that God, as a sort of "Earth Spirit," permeates every bit of matter and is part of the evolving universe, a theory called panentheism.

As Michael Morwood explains in his book It’s Time: Challenges to the Doctrine of the Faith (self-published under Kelmor Publishing, 2013): "The thesis of this book is that much of Catholic doctrine, specifically defined dogma about God, Jesus and Mary, being safeguarded and promoted by the CDF [Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith] on behalf of the Roman Catholic Church, has outlived its use-by date. … There are undeniable implications for and challenges to traditional doctrine when the notion of God as a heavenly deity is replaced by an understanding that the word ‘God’ points to a Mystery that permeates everything that exists" (pp. 3-4).

According to Morwood’s website, he resigned from the priesthood and his religious order after the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the hierarchy in his native Australia silenced him because of errors in two of his earlier books. Yet Morwood’s website shows that he speaks regularly at retreat houses in this country that are sponsored by Catholic sisters, and his book seems to be circulating within some religious orders....

The new cosmology also was cited as one of the problems found by the CDF doctrinal assessment of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR).

Archbishop Leonard Blair of Hartford, Conn., who, as bishop of Toledo, Ohio, had conducted the assessment, explained in an open letter published in the June 8, 2012, Toledo diocesan paper: "LCWR speakers also explore themes like global spirituality, the new cosmology, earth-justice and eco-feminism in ways that are frequently ambiguous, dubious or even erroneous with respect to Christian faith."

Nevertheless, just two months after that letter, the LCWR annual assembly in August welcomed as its keynote speaker Barbara Marx Hubbard, a proponent of the new cosmology.

In 2013, Franciscan Sister Ilia Delio likewise gave a keynote on the new cosmology at the LCWR assembly. DVDs were made of both keynotes and sold by the LCWR.

... the winter 2014 issue of the LCWR Occasional Papers is dedicated to the new cosmology, with several of the authors referencing both Sister Ilia and Barbara Marx Hubbard. Read more >>
[Hat tip to Sir A.S.]

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Lessons on the psychology of heresy from Pius VI's Auctorem Fidei

The papal Bull Auctorem Fidei was Pope Pius VI's Constitution against the Errors of the Synod of Pistoia (1786) in Italy. Those errors consisted of the Gallican and Jansenist acts and tendencies represented by the Synod, a tapestry of novelties introduced under the veil of ambiguity, distortion, and obfuscation. The former Bishop of Pistoia, Scipione de' Ricci, is said to have "embarked on confusing, destroying, and utterly overturning [sound Christian doctrine] by introducing troublesome novelties under the guise of a sham reform."

The document has been repeatedly cited by later Popes when called to combat doctrinal errors in the 19th and 20th centuries. It is mentioned in Indulgentiarum Doctrina, Quo Graviora, Commissum Divinitus, Mysterium Fidei and Pascendi Dominici Gregis.

The introductory part of this Bull (advisory: see Rules 7-9)makes for instructive reading because of the uncanny clarity with which Pius VI describes the psychology of the heretical mind and its methods (emphasis Mundabor's):
They [ our most holy predecessors] knew the capacity of innovators in the art of deception. In order not to shock the ears of Catholics, the innovators sought to hide the subtleties of their tortuous maneuvers by the use of seemingly innocuous words such as would allow them to insinuate error into souls in the most gentle manner. Once the truth had been compromised, they could, by means of slight changes or additions in phraseology, distort the confession of the faith that is necessary for our salvation, and lead the faithful by subtle errors to their eternal damnation. This manner of dissimulating and lying is vicious, regardless of the circumstances under which it is used. For very good reasons it can never be tolerated in a synod of which the principal glory consists above all in teaching the truth with clarity and excluding all danger of error. Moreover, if all this is sinful, it cannot be excused in the way that one sees it being done, under the erroneous pretext that the seemingly shocking affirmations in one place are further developed along orthodox lines in other places, and even in yet other places corrected; as if allowing for the possibility of either affirming or denying the statement, or of leaving it up the personal inclinations of the individual – such has always been the fraudulent and daring method used by innovators to establish error. It allows for both the possibility of promoting error and of excusing it. It is a most reprehensible technique for the insinuation of doctrinal errors and one condemned long ago by our predecessor St. Celestine, who found it used in the writings of Nestorius, bishop of Constantinople, and which he exposed in order to condemn it with the greatest possible severity. Once these texts were examined carefully, the impostor was exposed and confounded, for he expressed himself in a plethora of words, mixing true things with others that were obscure; mixing at times one with the other in such a way that he was also able to confess those things which were denied while at the same time possessing a basis for denying those very sentences which he confessed.
What methods does Pius use to expose the error?
In order to expose such snares, something which becomes necessary with a certain frequency in every century, no other method is required than the following: Whenever it becomes necessary to expose statements that disguise some suspected error or danger under the veil of ambiguity, one must denounce the perverse meaning under which the error opposed to Catholic truth is camouflaged.
[Hat tip to S. Armaticus via JM]

Thursday, November 07, 2013

"More terrifying statements from Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga"

Lawrencinium Tiberius, "More terrifying statements from Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga" (A Blog for Dallas Area Catholics, November 4, 2013), posts the following via via Louis Verrechio, consisting of quotations from the Cardinal followed by (I think) Verrechio's remarks in red:
The Church could not continue posing as a reality facing the world, as a parallel “perfect society,” which pursued her own autonomous course, strengthening her walls against the errors and the influence of the world. This antithesis of centuries needed to be overcome.  [Why on earth is that?  Because modernists didn't like it? Because it kept modernist Catholic academics from being invited to all the really great conferences?]
 The Church did not have a monopoly on truth anymore, [a very dangerous statement.  Truth in what area?  In Faith and Morals, She has all the Truth that is needed for salvation and is really the only valid repository of that Truth necessary for salvation.  But, no, the Church never had a monopoly on all "truth," such as the truth about asphault mixing, or corn raising, or oil drilling, or car manufacturing.  But this is vague and imprudent]  nor could she pontificate on a thousand human matters, [this is just a bald assertion.  Why can't She?  Because modernists don't want Her to?]  or hold stances denoting arrogance or superiority. [that is the ancient shibolleth.  The pre-conciliar Church was arrogant and proud.  Please.  It is not pride to be Divinely-instituted as Christ' Body on earth and the means of salvation, outside of which there is none.  This is not "arrogance." This is REVELATION.]  Instead, she should go out into the common arena, plainly and humbly, and share in the common search for truth.  [Full stop.  This is the assumption undergirding all the rest. The Church, apparently to this cardinal, is just one among many, basically equal.  She has some truthiness, but not enough.  She needs to get more from others.  Those others are at least as valid and salvific as the Church.  This is one of the major conclusions of modernist and neo-modernist thought.  I don't know if Cardinal Rodriguez Maradiaga is a modernist, but he certainly says some things that are very modernist sounding.]
Dialogue should precede the mission, as a simple attitude of listening, to build on what is common, rather that to insist in what divides, [I have come not to bring peace, but the sword.  I will divide father from son........] and to count on the contribution of humanisms and of non-Christian religions, which will take us back to the foundation of any creed, any ideology. What is Christian has its substrata, first and foremost, in what is human.  
For his own commentary, visit the linked post by Tiberius and scroll down to the bottom of the quotations from Cardinal Maradiaga.

[Hat tip to Nina Bryhn]

Saturday, October 12, 2013

I'm sorry, Virginia: yes, there is a hell, and you'd better avoid it if you can


This is getting some play over in a post entitled "How many people are going to Hell... and why?" at Fr. Z's Blog, where he posts Voris' video and writes:
The greatest accomplishment of the Enemy of our souls is to deceive people that the Enemy doesn’t exist … that there is no Hell … that people can’t go to Hell … that no one is in Hell, blah blah blah. Let’s be clear about this. Catholics are obliged to believe in the existence of the Devil and of Hell. These are de fide doctrines taught by the Church without the possibility of error. The Devil exists. Fallen angels hate you with a malice no human can imagine. They have an intellect that surpasses our mere human faculties in a way that we can’t fathom. They never tire. They are relentless. They are real. If you don’t believe in the existence of malicious fallen angels, you are in serious risk of joining them in Hell. This is no joke.
The combox at Fr. Z's has been lit up with some provocative exchanges, and even this forray into regions where angels fear to tread by our own correspondent and private eye, Guy Noir:
Fr Barron and Pope Benedict and Pope John Paul II are all, quite simply, wrong on this point. You have to be a theologian to miss it! Even suggesting “most” will be saved is a rather comical take on Scripture, and in his encyclical on hope Benedict uses purgatory to push a quasi-universalism. He states most everyone will end up there, prior to Heaven. All of this is plainly and extension of Vatican II’s reformation of doctrine. It is not a valid development, anymore than is the wholesale abandonment on inerrancy. I challenge anyone here to go read Barron, and re-listen to Vorris. Barron essentially says, the pope is always right. Vorris is spot on. God bless him.
[Hat tip to JM]

Sunday, August 04, 2013

Are traditionalists "Pelagians"?

This is an easy accusation to make, I would suppose. Recalling the accusations made by Tracy Rowland, for example, and discounting for the moment the rebuttals, one might be tempted quite easily to suggest that traditionalists are Pharisaical, concerned with mere externals, empty forms of liturgy, with the "letter" rather than the "spirit" of the law, with "works righteousness," and "earning salvation" rather than receiving the free gift of God's grace, and so forth. (Not so incidentally, notice that these criticisms sound very much like Protestant Fundamentalist criticisms of Catholicism generally.)

Such accusations will doubtless bolster the morale of non-traditionalist Catholics while, yet again, "making life next to impossible," as Adfero suggests, "for the traditional-minded parish priest who is, now more than ever, being accused by his flock of putting himself "above the Church" by his devotion to reverence in the liturgy and traditional Catholic teaching."

What follows, however, is a very solid retort by a Catholic priest (yes, in "full communion"), which completely turns the tables on the accusers in 6 succinct (but also well-developed) points, in a homily (?) posted by Adfero under the title of "Confused how some Catholics can be labeled 'Pelagians'?" (Rorate Caeli, August 4, 2013):
  1. Widespread nonchalance toward infant baptism betrays a Pelagian indifference toward grace in the view that unbaptized infants automatically go to heaven;
  2. The common assumption that man is naturally good, that even atheists can do good works, etc., often betrays a pronounced Pelagian disregard for supernatural charity infused in the soul co-operating with an actual grace given by God for an action to be truly pleasing to God;
  3. The frequently declared opinion that Jews need not convert but require no more than the Old Law to be saved represents a decidedly Pelagian disregard for the indispensable necessity of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and Atoning work of Christ;
  4. The widespread acceptance of the view that death is natural to man (often along with belief in Darwinian Evolution) displays a quasi-Pelagian affirmation in the dispensability of the supernatural order of grace, according to which death is utterly unnatural and never intended by God, but only permitted as a consequence for sin;
  5. The widespread indifference toward sacramental Confession betrays a pernicious Pelagian that we need no more than the good moral example of Jesus to elicit our innate natural goodness and that we have no need of sacramental grace to reconcile us to God;
  6. The widespread indifference toward the social reign of Christ the King reveals a striking affinity for Pelagius' denial that Christ Our Lord came to restore what Adam had lost but rather came merely to provide a good example.
The only point in which a parallel is recognized between traditional Catholics and Pelagius is in the matter of discipline and austerity, though the author of the piece expresses his wish that more traditional Catholics were austere with themselves, declaring: "Oh how they would please Our Lady who asked us over and over again for nearly 200 years… Penance! Penance! Penance! For the salvation of souls!"

Well, so who are the Pelagians? The author states his conclusion: "It is clear to me that the modern Church in her membership has become more Pelagian than ever whereas Traditional minded Catholics are seeking to hold the line against this most pestiferous return of heresy… striving not to let the precious grace of God granted them be in vain!"