New York Times rejects Planned Parenthood material as "too graphic," "shocking"

This week, both the New York Times and Washington Post rejected a full page advertisement from American Life League as "too graphic" and "shocking" for their adult readers. What was too graphic? The full page color advertisement showed images from actual Planned Parenthood "sex-ed materials" used for children as young as 10 years of age. (Source - ALL, April 25, 2013) -- Advisory: Graphic, offensive content!!!


It seems that the "new and improved" Planned Parenthood has now moved beyond its slaughter house abortuaries and free condom handouts to selling sex toys, masturbatory techniques, fisting and other instructions for homosexual sex as a means of birth control.

Your tax dollars at work folks. $487.4 million! People who approve of this have a right to go to Hell, I suppose, if that's what they want. They don't have a right to take your children and the entire country with them. Defund Planned Parenthood now!

Perverse irony! Those who shriek the loudest at the outrage of pederast child-abuse sex scandals in the Church promote the very life-style of recreational and experimental sex play that leads straight to the perverted dispositions that yielded the sex scandals to begin with. Fie upon this perverse filth! If a dirty old man showed a booklet with these images to a couple of children in a park, he'd be arrested. But when Planned Parenthood shows them to kids in a classroom, it gets government money (i.e., your tax dollars).