tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post3744666232344730446..comments2024-03-28T16:16:51.062-04:00Comments on Musings of a Pertinacious Papist: Just for fun: How to ruin a good round of love-making?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-38646361299981145492014-08-06T22:27:30.662-04:002014-08-06T22:27:30.662-04:00Related, and very good:
"It really does not ...Related, and very good:<br /><br />"It really does not matter how many orgasms you have, or how intense they are, you are still going to die."<br /><br />http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/firstthoughts/2014/08/why-porn-matters JMnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-16856393978510298252014-08-06T14:32:51.991-04:002014-08-06T14:32:51.991-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.JMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06684142528414196410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-65896240923598928222014-08-05T17:28:04.283-04:002014-08-05T17:28:04.283-04:00I'd suggest it isn't experiencing lust tha...I'd suggest it isn't experiencing lust that is at issue, but managing it. It is about fulfillment, but it is not *all* about fulfillment. Or something along those lines.JMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06684142528414196410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-6910246979327928062014-08-05T12:08:07.222-04:002014-08-05T12:08:07.222-04:00continued. It is the free love crowd who are '...continued. It is the free love crowd who are 'taking all the fun out of it' by insisting that it is morally innocuous. No, one CAN'T have sex without experiencing lust. But that natural fact does not mean we should not regret our concupiscence.RFGA, Ph.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11981669525574676528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-70764393819197075682014-08-05T11:39:22.971-04:002014-08-05T11:39:22.971-04:00The desire for sex, even with one's beloved sp...The desire for sex, even with one's beloved spouse, is naturally inspired and sustained by impure thoughts. So it's sinful through and through, requiring frequent Confession. But a firm purpose of amendment in this context cannot mean foreswearing conjugal relations. Thus, it must be the willingness to be purged in eternity of concupiscence. Nothing here suggests anhedonia.RFGA, Ph.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/11981669525574676528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-51010380264140121962014-08-04T21:24:55.076-04:002014-08-04T21:24:55.076-04:00I am guessing most people will read the above and ...I am guessing most people will read the above and think: How does one have sex without experiencing lust?<br /><br />-AegisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6312447.post-89725208975096205182014-08-04T20:49:51.345-04:002014-08-04T20:49:51.345-04:00“What good Christians don’t realize is that sexual...“What good Christians don’t realize is that sexual sin is not recreational sex gone overboard. Sexual sin is predatory. It won’t be ‘healed’ by redeeming the context or the genders. Sexual sin must simply be killed. What is left of your sexuality after this annihilation is up to God. But healing, to the sexual sinner, is death; nothing more and nothing less. I told me audience that I think too many young Christian fornicators plan that marriage will redeem their sin. Too many young Christian masturbators plan that marriage will redeem their patterns.. Too many young Christian internet pornographers think that having legitimate sex will take away the desire to have illicit sex. They’re wrong. And the marriages that result from this line of thinking are dangerous places. . . . Marriage does not redeem sin. Only Jesus Himself can do that” --R ButterfieldJMhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06684142528414196410noreply@blogger.com